<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Renata Phelps</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2011  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps</link>
<description>Recent documents in Renata Phelps</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 02:15:26 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	







<item>
<title>Improving practice through program evaluation</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/200</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/200</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 21:24:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>I can u can: six strategies for building teachers’ ICT confidence and capability through metacognitive discussion and reflection: experiences from Technology Together</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/199</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/199</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:44:49 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>When people are prompted to think about their values, beliefs and their past experiences they will often start to recognise factors that impact on their learning and this recognition can bring key insights into how they can help themselves to change. It can assist them to realise the strengths and limitations of various learning strategies and change their perspectives and behaviours. Computer learners can also be prompted to see that becoming a proficient computer using teacher is more about their attitudes and learning strategies than it is about having some ‘magic’ personal quality or set of skills. Technology Together, the ICT professional development approach that forms the basis of this paper, employs a metacognitive approach to teacher learning and fosters discussion and reflection within the whole school community. This paper describes and provides evaluative feedback on six strategies that can be implemented within a whole-school context. The paper provides evidence of the value of such strategies in building school cultures that are supportive of teachers’ ongoing learning.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Technology together: supporting whole-schools to become capable learning communities</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/198</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/198</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:44:46 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>While many teachers are integrating information and communication technology (ICT) in their teaching practice, there are still a significant number of teachers who are hesitant, reluctant or resistant to using technology, either personally and/or in their teaching. Many teachers remain daunted by the rapid rate of technological change, and the inability to feel as though they ‘know enough’. While most approaches to teacher professional development concentrate on skill development of individual teachers, this paper describes an approach that focuses instead on the values, attitudes, beliefs, confidence and learning strategies of teachers, and on building a culture within a school that supports ICT capability, not just competency. Technology Together is currently being developed collaboratively by Southern Cross University and the Catholic Education Office, Lismore, funded by the Australian Research Council (ARC). This paper presents initial findings, which indicate that the approach can have significant outcomes for schools, not only in relation to ICT learning and  integration, but in building a whole-school learning community which fosters collaborative and supportive partnerships between school leaders, teachers and students.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Supporting children’s mental health in schools: teacher views</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/197</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/197</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:23:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Schools have increasingly been targeted as appropriate sites for mental health promotion and teachers are considered well placed to identify issues concerning students’ social and emotional well-being. Whilst teachers are now expected to be responsive to a wide range of student needs and circumstances, they receive little in their pre-service and subsequent teacher education to adequately prepare them for such realities. This paper reports the findings of a study that investigated teacher perspectives on student mental health and mental health education, including their sense of self-efficacy in relation to promoting and supporting children’s mental well-being in schools. These findings highlight a complex interplay between teachers’ constructions of ‘mental health’, the importance they place on mental health promotion in schools, issues of teacher confidence, role identity conflict and school culture, as well as teachers’ own sense of mental well-being. The discussion signals a need to pay close attention to the assumptions, values, beliefs and attitudes of teachers in relation to children’s mental health since these are integral to their confidence and skill in supporting children’s social and emotional well-being.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anne Graham et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Mapping the complexity of computer learning: journeying beyond teaching for computer competency to facilitating computer</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/196</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/196</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 21:57:21 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>For future generations to maximise their capability to operate within technologically driven economies, it is critical to foster computer abilities at every level of the schooling process. Teachers are central to this process. Yet, for many teachers, the need to integrate computer use in their teaching is threatening and overwhelming. This thesis argues that, given the rapid rate of technological change, skills-based approaches to computer education inadequately prepare teachers for a career of continued technological change. Effective computer education for teachers requires more than skills training. It involves changes in attitudes, values and beliefs that provide confidence for ongoing learning. Furthermore, it involves learning to adapt to change, to be flexible, intuitive and above all persistent. It requires the fostering of teachers who know how to be self-directed and independent in their computer learning, rather than those dependent on structured routines or guidelines. This thesis is the ‘story’ of an action research initiative underpinned by a belief in the importance of approaches to computer education which foster lifelong computer learning. It traces the journey of a reflexive process of change and iterative development in the teaching of an educational information technology (computer) unit to pre-service teacher education students. Over a period of three years (1999-2001) I pursued a central research question, namely: How can I develop my teaching practice to better facilitate the development of capable computer users? The research explores the distinction between a ‘competent’ and a ‘capable’ computer user and trials a range of teaching and learning approaches that aim to facilitate the development of capable computer users.  From this constructivist research and teaching process a multidimensional approach to computer education emerged, founded on metacognition and reflection. This approach is demonstrated to offer many advantages over a skills-focused approach. This thesis maps the complexity of the computer learning and teaching context, arguing that simplistic approaches to teaching will produce narrow and limited learning outcomes. Rather, a holistic approach is proposed, one that moves beyond the development of computer competency toward a longer term vision of facilitating computer capability. It is argued that the role of the computer ‘teacher’ is to foster reflective awareness and develop a learning environment that can assist computer learners to become comfortable existing on the ‘edge of chaos’.  This research supports previous studies which indicate the important role of computer self efficacy and the influence of factors such as perceived usefulness, anxiety, support and frequency and duration of use. However, the research also documents the unpredictable influence of these factors on individuals’ resultant approach to computers and challenges dichotomous interpretations of such factors. Appropriate attribution is also shown to be a major influence on computer capability, as are factors such as help-seeking, motivation and goal-setting, although again, these influences are non-linear. It is argued that computer capability cannot be ‘taught’ but, rather, computer educators should look to creating environments where its emergence can be facilitated. The metacognitive computer learning context developed and explored through this research is one such approach.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Springboard to teaching: a partnership in practice</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/195</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/195</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:19:04 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Anne Graham et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>ICT in the secondary visual arts classroom</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/194</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/194</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:46:59 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Enhancing innovation in ICT integration and flexible delivery options in the School of Education through a focus on collegial staff development and co-teaching</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/193</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/193</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:46:55 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Action research within the complexity paradigm</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/192</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/192</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:59:31 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Exploring new metaphors for teacher professional development: the technology together story through the lense of complexity</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/191</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/191</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 20:59:27 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Staff development for online delivery: a collaborative team-based action learning model</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/190</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/190</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 17:09:16 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>For academics to successfully make the transition to online teachers or learning facilitators, they must do more than develop new technical skills. Online development and delivery requires new pedagogical approaches, challenging previous practices with regards to assessment, group interaction and student/teacher dialogue. Furthermore, it necessitates attention to issues concerning academic work practices. Online delivery challenges traditional notions of academics working in isolation and instead brings together teams of people each with unique skills, into a course design and development team.</p>
<p>This paper describes the early phases of a systems change approach being implemented in the School of Social and Workplace Development at Southern Cross University. An ongoing collaborative action learning model is described as a vehicle for staff development and change management. This consisted of twice weekly team meetings and training sessions. These sessions represented a balance of outside expertise and experiences being brought into the group, and reflective and "idea sharing" sessions amongst the development team itself. A mixture of technological, pedagogical and managerial issues were covered and discussions were fully documented throughout the process.</p>
<p>Information on changing staff attitudes was collected via a series of semistructured interviews recorded at various stages over the course of unit development and early delivery stages, as well as staff completing weekly "reflection sheets" on their experiences. Enthusiasm, collaboration and a sense of ownership are identified as major factors driving the change process. Major barriers included difficulties of dividing time between varied commitments, the importance of timeliness of training components and the need to develop policy and guidelines "on the run". Further data collection such as time commitments from staff and skill requirements at each phase of development were used to develop guidelines and recommendations for further rounds of development and for budgetary planning.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Allan Ellis et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The role of reflection and mentoring in ICT teacher professional development: dialogue and learning across the hemispheres</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/189</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/189</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:02:33 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>As school systems internationally seek to improve the models of professional development they are providing for their teachers to support them in integrating information and communication technology (ICT) in their teaching practice, growing opportunities emerge to compare and contrast approaches employed in different cultural contexts and to learn from each other. This paper arose from dialogue between the two authors about ICT professional development approaches being implemented in Norway and one regional area in Australia. Three programs of professional development which the authors had been involved with are described and these are compared and contrasted to reveal significant similarities and poignant differences between the approaches. The paper proposes some key success factors in ICT professional development, in particular mentoring and reflection, and goes on to illustrate how the comparative analysis of the approaches being used in different contexts was beneficial in informing further developments in both countries. In particular the paper argues that the processes and substance of reflection are critical to overall success, and that a focus on metacognitive reflection can support continuing professional learning outcomes for teachers.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Grete Jamissen et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Discovering virtual stories together</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/188</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/188</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:51:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Christine Jeffrey et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Attracting the bright and committed into teaching: political rhetoric or practical reality?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/187</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/187</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 14:57:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This article reports on a university developed board endorsed course (UDBEC), which allows higher school certificate (HSC) students to undertake two units of an undergraduate teaching degree as part of their final year of schooling. The course, Springboard into teaching, is a collaborative initiative of the School of Education at Southern Cross University (SCU) and the Catholic education office (CEO) in Lismore, New South Wales (NSW). The course aimed to attract students to the teaching profession, and targeted motivated and high achieving students with an interest in studying teaching at the local university. This article describes Springboard into teaching, and summarises the evaluation of the course. The evaluation process included a survey of the course participants. All respondents indicated that the course had confirmed their interests in pursuing a teaching career.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Anne Graham et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Competency, capability, complexity and computers: exploring a new model for conceptualising end-user computer education</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/186</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/186</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:43:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Notions of competency have dominated the computer education literature, and have underpinned Competency-Based Training (CBT) in information technology at all levels of education and training. The emergence of counter-narratives underpinned by the capability movement, have as yet had minimal impact on practice in computer education. New discourses in educational theory and practice which are founded on non-linear approaches to learning and teaching provide added impetus to engage in the competency/capability debate, and re-examine our approaches to computer education. This paper explores complexity theories and demonstrates how complexity's pedagogical implications can lead to new models for understanding computer learning and teaching. A new model for conceptualising end-user computer education is presented that was derived from a three-year action research initiative with pre-service teachers.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Recipe or performing art?: challenging conventions for writing action research theses</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/185</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/185</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:40:30 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This article explores the tensions and incongruities between conventional thesis presentation and the principles of action research. Through the experiences of the authors alternative approaches to thesis structure are proposed which are argued to be more congruent with the epistemological, methodological and ethical aspects of action research. Consistent with our arguments, the article is presented as a play. Act I considers the tensions facing research students wishing to write up their action research in the context of conventional thesis writing requirements; Act II consists of four ‘scenes’, each of which illustrates a key learning arising from our own stories: writing in the researcher as central to the research; staying true to the unfolding research story; using metaphor; and finally, weaving literature throughout the thesis. Act III considers the challenges of examination in the face of breaking with tradition. We conclude with a ‘curtain call’ from the narrator that offers a reflexive engagement with the main themes of the article.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Kath Fisher et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>The metacognitive approach to computer education: making explicit the learning journey</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/184</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/184</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:40:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper presents a theoretical and practical exploration of a metacognitive approach to computer education, developed through a three-year action research project. It is argued that the approach contrasts significantly with often-employed directive and competency-based approaches to computer education and is more appropriate in addressing the longer-term learning needs of professionals such as teachers. The metacognitive approach focuses on beliefs, attitudes and learning strategies and assists learners to come to terms with the nature of technological change and their own ability to confront this change by embracing life-long computer learning. In this paper, the metacognitive approach is presented through a three-dimensional diagram. An exploration is also provided as to how the approach was developed and refined, through the research, into a print-based, self-paced learning resource which forms one component of a flexibly-delivered computer education course. It is argued that the metaphor of ‘journey’ might profitably be employed to support teachers to understand the unique and individual interplay of metacognitive factors on their approach to using computers.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Developing technology together, together: a whole-school metacognitive approach to ICT teacher professional development</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/183</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/183</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:40:28 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Professional development of teachers in information and communication technology (ICT) continues to be an urgent educational imperative. While many teachers are integrating ICT (with varying degrees of confidence and creativity), a significant number still remain hesitant, reluctant and daunted by the rapid rate of technological change. Far from being a simple process, ICT professional development necessitates not only personal and professional changes for individuals, but changes in school culture including institutional attitude and support for professional learning, reflection and professional discussion, readiness to embrace change, collegiality, trust and encouragement to take risks. Grounded in research about what influences teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT, this paper describes a three-year action research initiative that led to the development of a whole-school metacognitive approach to ICT teacher professional development known as Technology Together. The paper will describe the approach and findings from the research, indicating that the metacognitive approach can be successfully implemented within a whole-school environment. Data suggests that the process can have a positive impact on the culture of the school and that the outcomes were most significant at schools who implemented the process most consistently with the foundations of the metacognitive approach.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Complexity and action research: exploring the theoretical and methodological connection</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/182</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/182</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:40:27 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Complexity theory is essentially a formal attempt to question how coherent and purposive wholes emerge from the interactions of simple and sometimes non-purposive components. Explicit recognition of complexity can provide a fresh and enlightening perspective on action research. Through an expository discussion of the foundational postulates of complexity theory this article demonstrates the theoretical and methodological connections between complexity and action research, with particular emphasis on the relevance of complexity in educational and workplace contexts. Complexity is an emerging theoretical perspective, which presents possibilities for revolutionizing approaches to action research, as well as strengthening arguments promoting the value of action research in a wide range of contexts. Complexity, it is argued, can provide a valuable theoretical underpinning for action research. Furthermore, action research provides a valid methodological approach to the study of complexity. This article is primarily theoretical and attempts to demonstrate the application of complexity to a specific action research project will be left to future publication(s). Rather, this article explores the general applicability of complexity as both theory and metaphor in action research. The article begins with a brief exploration of the theory, particularly focusing on its application in the social sciences. The theoretical and methodological connections between complexity and action research are discussed through several of the foundational postulates of complexity, how these manifest in action research and how they add to our understanding of action research itself.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Evaluation of the Children&apos;s Outreach Health Programme, Royal Far West Children&apos;s Health Scheme, Manly</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/180</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/renata_phelps/180</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:10:11 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Renata Phelps et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>

