<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Robert Crockett</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2010  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/rcrocket</link>
<description>Recent documents in Robert Crockett</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:59:54 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Project Based Learning as a Catalyst for Academic Evolution and as an Incubator for Academic Innovation</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/rcrocket/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/rcrocket/2</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:43:34 PST</pubDate>
<description>As engineering education at the undergraduate level continues to evolve, the support structure required for educational approaches such as Project-Based Learning (PBL) is expanding to include not only the Department, College, and University levels, but also significant commitments from industrial partners. While the benefits of project based learning approaches are clear, there are a number of challenges in establishing and maintaining the deep level of institutional and industrial interaction required to create a successful program.This paper discusses several approaches adopted by the Project Based Learning Institute (PBLI) in developing project-centered relationships with external organizations. PBLI serves as an academic incubator that has been used to overcome institutional inertia by creating a structure that lies outside existing well-established &quot;territories&quot;. It discusses the self supporting nature of the approach, which allows resource issues which typically shackle initiatives to be obviated. It describes how the program has developed into a catalyst for industry participation that benefits both students and corporate sponsors. It describes the how the juxtaposition of high-potential faculty, coupled with incentives for multidisciplinary faculty collaboration, enriches the educational experience for students. The outcome is underpinned by vehicles that couple industry interests to university resources. This system, which hinges on an effective mechanism to uncover and respond to industry needs, creates an environment capable of educating an engineering graduate who is steeped in multidisciplinary, who is exceptionally team-oriented and who is more able to function in today's complex environment.</description>

<author>Daniel Walsh</author>


<category>Conference Proceedings</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Action at Distance: A MS Degree Offered Through Distance Learning as a Vector to Student Enrichment and Industrial Interaction</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/rcrocket/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/rcrocket/1</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:12:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>This paper describes the development and implementation of a flourishing MS program offered through distance learning (DL). The program serves the mission of the university – polytechnic education. It provides an intense life-long-learning opportunity for some of the 300,000 degreed engineers working in California industry who can benefit from graduate education. The DL Masters Degree Program in Engineering with a Biomedical Specialization was designed and developed with verisimilitude to the on-campus program in mind. The distance students attend the same classes as students on campus. The DL program has the same learning objectives and student outcomes as those expected for the on-site students. Furthermore, the program for distance students has the same standards and curricular flexibilities as available to students on campus, the program accommodates the challenging schedules of full-time industry employees.The paper describes the motivations for the development of the program at the university and in industry. It treats the challenges faced in implementing the program during its early stages, and fault tolerance schemes developed by participants. It discusses the evolution of the program from single to multi-site. It describes the growth of the program from a specialization offered under an Engineering MS degree to a stand-alone MS Degree offered by the Biomedical Engineering Department over the eight year history of the program. The paper catalogs the benefits of the program to on-campus students as well as to off-campus participants. The paper discusses the evolution of the program from a synchronous mode to a hybrid mix of synchronous and asynchronous delivery modes to accommodate student needs. It also discusses the development of a resource model which allows the program to be implemented within a typical academic administrative structure.This paper thus describes an innovative DL program which serves the aspirations of students, pedagogical goals of the department, and aspirations of faculty in BMED. The MS program in BMED is the largest MS granting program at the University, and about 10% of the degrees granted by BMED annually are DL degrees.</description>

<author>Lanny Griffin</author>


<category>Conference Proceedings</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>

