<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>RAND Health — Bing Center for Health Economics</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012 RAND Corporation All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/rand</link>
<description>Recent documents in RAND Health — Bing Center for Health Economics</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 03:39:35 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	



<item>
<title>Income Taxes, Compensating Differentials, and Occupational Choice: How Taxes Distort the Wage-Amenity Decision</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/david_powell/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/david_powell/7</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:34:52 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The link between taxes and occupational choices is central for understanding the welfare impacts of income taxes. Just as taxes distort the labor-leisure decision, they may also distort the wage-amenity decision. Yet, there have been few studies on the full response along this margin. When tax rates increase, workers favor jobs with lower wages and more amenities. We introduce a two-step methodology which uses compensating differentials to characterize the tax elasticity of occupational choice. We estimate a significant compensated elasticity of 0.03, implying that a 10 percent increase in the net-oftax rate causes workers to change to a 0.3 percent higher wage job.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>David Powell et al.</author>


</item>




</channel>
</rss>

