Phoebe A. Haddon

Constitutional Law: Cases, History, and Dialogues, 3rd edition

William D. Araiza et al. — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:29:31 PST

One of this book's distinguishing features is its series of Dialogues in which the authors debate issues relevant to the cases. In the Dialogues the authors engage both each other and the cases, and in doing so reveal their own and the Justices' methodological, ideological, and policy assumptions. Students benefit from having this information as they form their own opinions about the doctrine. The Dialogues also provide a starting point for more insightful class discussions, by presenting the material in the context of the authors' viewpoints.

First Amendment Law: Cases, Comparative Perspectives, and Dialogues

Donald E. Lively et al. — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:29:30 PST

Tort Law: Cases, Perspectives, and Problems. 4th edition

Thomas C. Galligan et al. — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:29:28 PST

The Fourth Edition of this unique casebook has been dramatically revised. This new edition presents the important cases, statutes, empirical data, and competing tort theories in a problems-oriented format that is designed to help students acquire a sophisticated understanding of tort law through active learning. As before, the text includes a large number of problems Now, however, the Problems, updated and considerably expanded, are organized in Sets at the end of each substantive chapter. This extensively re-written and reorganized edition includes the classic common law torts cases, but is updated throughout with teachable, cutting-edge decisions that will demand student interest and hold their attention. Particular care has been to take account of the most recent commentaries on tort law, such as the growing importance of the Restatement (Third) of Torts.

A Constitutional Law Anthology, 2d edition

Michael J. Glennon et al. — Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:29:27 PST

A Public Calling: Lessons From the Lives of Judges of Color in Pennsylvania

Phoebe A. Haddon — Wed, 09 Nov 2011 05:38:45 PST

This paper discusses how Judge Clifford Scott Green, Judge William Marutani, and Judge Juanita Kidd Stout spent their lives as leaders in the law to illustrate the ideal of a "public calling."

Educating Lawyers with a Global Vision

Phoebe A. Haddon — Tue, 08 Feb 2011 09:27:49 PST

This article is based on a presentation made at Justice & the Global Economy, a conference celebrating the appointment of Phoebe A. Haddon as the ninth Dean of the University of Maryland School of Law, October 3, 2009.

Coalescing with SALT: A Taste for Inclusion

Phoebe A. Haddon — Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:52:40 PDT

Recent Decisions

Phoebe A. Haddon — Tue, 04 Aug 2009 13:20:15 PDT

Rethinking the Jury

Phoebe A. Haddon — Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:04:04 PDT

An Independent Judiciary: the Life and Writings of Robert N.C. Nix, Jr.

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:35 PDT

Does Grutter Offer Courts an Opportunity to Consider Race in Jury Selection and Decisions Related to Promoting Fairness in the Deliberation Process?

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:34 PDT

This essay considers whether the two recent Supreme Court affirmative action cases, the Michigan law school and undergraduate cases, Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, provide support for opening the process of jury selection and deliberation to more fully include people of color and other under-represented groups and their experiences. I shall argue that these recent affirmative action cases can provide some support for ensuring better representation of people of color in the jury selection process, challenging the pre-textual use of peremptories and opening opportunities to talk about race during trials. The Court's reasoning in Grutter that diversity is a value that a law school can appropriately promote when it considers the admissions qualifications of candidates could lead the Court similarly to sustain limited race-conscious efforts to assure a process of inclusion in jury selection and in steps leading up to and including deliberation. Grutter opens the possibility for persons concerned about improving the justice system to be able to persuade courts to develop more effective ways to inlcude our richly diverse citizenry in the jury system.

The MDP Controversy: What Legal Educators Should Know

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:33 PDT

Education for a Public Calling in the 21st Century

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:33 PDT

Constitutional Law : Cases, History, and Dialogues

William Araiza et al. — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:32 PDT

Academic Freedom and Governance: A Call for Increased Dialogue and Diversity

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:32 PDT

Misuse and Abuse of the LSAT: Making the Case for Alternative Evaluative Efforts and a Redefinition of Merit

Phoebe A. Haddon et al. — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:31 PDT

Baby Doe Cases: Compromise and Moral Dilemma

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:31 PDT

Remedies and Damages for Violation of Constitutional Rights

Frank M. McClellan et al. — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:31 PDT

All the Difference in the World: Listening and Hearing the Voices of Women

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:30 PDT

Keynote Address: Redefining our Roles in the Battle for Inclusion of People of Color in Legal Education

Phoebe A. Haddon — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:42:29 PDT