Skip to main content
Article
Knee Range of Motion: Reliability and Agreement of 3 Measurement Methods
The American Journal of Orthopedics
  • Paul G. Peters, Wright State University - Main Campus
  • Michael A. Herbenick, Wright State University - Main Campus
  • Philip A. Anloague, University of Dayton
  • Ronald J. Markert, Wright State University - Main Campus
  • L. Joseph Rubino, Wright State University - Main Campus
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2011
Abstract

We conducted a study to compare 3 methods of measuring knee range of motion: visual estimation by physicians, hand goniometry by physical therapists, and radiographic goniometry. We hypothesized that reliability would be high within and across all techniques. We found intrarater and interrater reliability to be satisfactory for visual estimation, hand goniometry, and radiographic goniometry. Interrater reliability across methods did not agree satisfactorily. Between-methods differences in estimating knee range of motion may result from variations in technique among physicians and physical therapists.

Inclusive pages
E249-E252
ISBN/ISSN
1078-4519
Document Version
Published Version
Comments

The document available for download is provided with the permission of the publisher. Documentation is on file.

To view the publisher's version, search for it in an academic library or in the publisher's online catalog.

Publisher
Quadrant HealthCom
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Citation Information
Paul G. Peters, Michael A. Herbenick, Philip A. Anloague, Ronald J. Markert, et al.. "Knee Range of Motion: Reliability and Agreement of 3 Measurement Methods" The American Journal of Orthopedics Vol. 40 Iss. 12 (2011)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/philip_anloague/4/