<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Paul Rogers</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers</link>
<description>Recent documents in Paul Rogers</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 01:31:05 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	

	
		
	







<item>
<title>Historical Patterns in Lichen Communities of Montane Quaking Aspen Forests</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/54</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/54</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:55:44 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Resilience in Quaking Aspen: Recent Advances and Future Needs</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/53</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/53</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:55:43 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Quaking Aspen (Populus tremuloides) sustainability is a topic of intense interest in forest ecology. Reports range from declines to persisting or increasing coverage in some areas. Moreover, there is little agreement on ultimate factors driving changes. Low aspen recruitment has been attributed to climate patterns, past management, herbivore increases, competitive interactions with conifers, predator and beaver extirpation, and livestock grazing. Several of these potential causes result from direct or indirect actions of human agency. On June 27–28, 2012 a group of leading aspen ecologists from diverse backgrounds convened at the High Lonesome Ranch in western Colorado to address the state of aspen science under the title, Resilience in Quaking Aspen: restoring ecosystem processes through applied science. The purposes of this meeting were to: (a) present disciplinary updates on recent developments; (b) focus our collective understanding on determining key research gaps; and, to the extent possible, (c) develop a plan to communicate both advances and science gaps to wider audiences. Presentations and group discussions were framed mainly in the geographic context of the western US. The symposium addressed dual central themes—historical aspen cover change and ungulate herbivory—both of which have important ramifications for future aspen resilience. We also found emergent themes in disturbance, climate work, and genetic innovation. This paper presents a brief review of the state of aspen science and a synopsis of issues and needs identified at the symposium. Detailed treatments of topics mentioned here are found in accompanying articles of this volume. A key recommendation from researchers here is that there are many ‘‘aspen types’’ and novel, landscape- or aspen type-specific, approaches will be required to appropriately address this regional diversity. We further emphasize needed interdisciplinary work addressing changing climates, altered disturbance patterns, intensive herbivory, and human drivers of ecological change.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Landscape assessment of a stable aspen community in southern Utah, USA</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/52</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/52</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:55:42 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Recent reports of rapid die-off of aspen (Populus tremuloides), coupled with vigorous debate over longterm reduction of aspen cover in western North America, has prompted considerable research given the importance of this forest type for economic and non-economic interests. Despite this interest, indicators of aspen conditions are poorly understood, and there is a lack of systematic monitoring of stable aspen landscapes. Stable aspen are defined here as being predominantly aspen overstorey (>80% basal area) with little or no conifer regeneration. We examined a putative stable aspen landscape in southern Utah and addressed (1) stand structure and (2) indicators of decline. We sampled 83 aspen-dominated stands within a 275 km2 landscape using established forest healthmonitoring protocols. Eighty-four percent of sample stands on Cedar Mountain exhibited stable aspen characteristics. Principal findings include: (1) a relatively uniform age of adults within the study area; (2) approximately 10% crown dieback on half of the plots sampled; (3) roughly 50% of the study plots had greater than 50% of the trees with damage to the bole; (4) about 25% of the adult basal area was dead; and (5) over half the plots had few sub-canopy individuals and/or limited regeneration. Physiographic variables including elevation, slope, and aspect were generally not strong indicators of aspen condition, typically explaining less than 15% of the variation in basal area, mortality, dieback, or damage. Healthy stands were rarely observed in the most drought prone locations, though the inverse was not necessarily true; healthy and unhealthy stands were found in more mesic settings. Principal components analysis identified two clusters of plots that differed considerably in regeneration; however, no other variables differed between these groupings.We suggest exogenous factors such as land-use history or altered disturbance regimes and endogenous factors such as soils and geology influence aspen condition on this landscape. Further research is necessary to test these hypotheses.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Landscape Assessment of a Stable Aspen Community in Southern Utah, USA</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/51</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/51</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 13:55:41 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Recent reports of rapid die-off of aspen (<em>Populus tremuloides</em>), coupled with vigorous debate over long-term reduction of aspen cover in western North America, has prompted considerable research given the importance of this forest type for economic and non-economic interests. Despite this interest, indicators of aspen conditions are poorly understood, and there is a lack of systematic monitoring of stable aspen landscapes. Stable aspen are defined here as being predominantly aspen overstorey (>80% basal area) with little or no conifer regeneration. We examined a putative stable aspen landscape in southern Utah and addressed (1) stand structure and (2) indicators of decline. We sampled 83 aspen-dominated stands within a 275 km<sup>2</sup> landscape using established forest health monitoring protocols. Eighty-four percent of sample stands on Cedar Mountain exhibited stable aspen characteristics. Principal findings include: (1) a relatively uniform age of adults within the study area; (2) approximately 10% crown dieback on half of the plots sampled; (3) roughly 50% of the study plots had greater than 50% of the trees with damage to the bole; (4) about 25% of the adult basal area was dead; and (5) over half the plots had few sub-canopy individuals and/or limited regeneration. Physiographic variables including elevation, slope, and aspect were generally not strong indicators of aspen condition, typically explaining less than 15% of the variation in basal area, mortality, dieback, or damage. Healthy stands were rarely observed in the most drought prone locations, though the inverse was not necessarily true; healthy and unhealthy stands were found in more mesic settings. Principal components analysis identified two clusters of plots that differed considerably in regeneration; however, no other variables differed between these groupings. We suggest exogenous factors such as land-use history or altered disturbance regimes and endogenous factors such as soils and geology influence aspen condition on this landscape. Further research is necessary to test these hypotheses.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Lichen Communities Indicator Results from Idaho: Baseline Sampling</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/50</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/50</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:16:23 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>P. Neitlich et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Lichen Communities for Forest Health Monitoring in Colorado, USA</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/49</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/49</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:16:19 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>B. McCune et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Forest Resources of the Apache-Sitgreaves National Forest</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/48</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/48</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:16:16 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Wyoming Forest Health Report: A Baseline Assessment, 1995-1998</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/47</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/47</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:16:13 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>L. Koch et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Aspen in the Sierra Nevada: Regional Conservation of a Continental Species</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/46</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/46</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:16:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Health of Idaho’s Forests: A Summary of Conditions, Issues and Implications</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/45</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/45</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:16:06 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>D. Atkins et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Monitoring the Health of Selected Eastern Arc Forests in Tanzania</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/44</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/44</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:16:02 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>S. Madoffe et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Technical Reporting Plan: Guidelines for Annual Regional Reports</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/43</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:59 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>FHM Lichen Community Results from Wyoming, 1997: A Preliminary Summary</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/42</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/42</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:55 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>P. Neitlich et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Ecology, Biodiversity, Management, and Restoration of Aspen in the Sierra Nevada</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/41</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/41</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:52 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>W. Shepperd et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Forest Health Monitoring in the Ngangao Forest, Taita Hills, Kenya: A Five Year Assessment of Change</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/40</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/40</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:49 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Summary and Abstracts from Sudden Aspen Decline (SAD) Meeting</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/39</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/39</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:45 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Don’t Miss the Invasions! A Note on Forest Health Monitoring in the Taita Hills, Kenya</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/38</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/38</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:43 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Guidelines for aspen restoration on the National Forests in Utah</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/37</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/37</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:40 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>These guidelines are a working document and will be tested within the Utah National Forests on dif- ferent aspen types.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mary O&apos;Brien et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Historical patterns in lichen communities of montane quaking aspen forests</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/36</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/36</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:37 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Climate shifts and resource exploitation in Rocky Mountain forests have caused profound changes in quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) structure and function since Euro-American settlement. It therefore seems likely that commensurate shifts in dependent epiphytes would follow major ecological transitions. In the current study, we merge several lines of inquiry to investigate historical changes using lichens as bioindicators of forest structure, air quality, and community composition. Though lichens are well known for their sensitivity to air borne pollutants, recent utilization in the monitoring realm has lead to novel uses as indicators of biodiversity and stand composition. A landscape- level investigation in northern Utah and southern Idaho, USA, was implemented to track contemporary and long-term impacts of humans on aspen forests and their dependent macrolichens. We use historical sources, climate data, fire records, and passive ammonia sensors alongside forest and lichen monitoring techniques to gain further insight into aspen and epiphytic lichen community change over the past 150 years. Our research shows that historic drought conditions correlated closely with pulses of aspen regeneration during this period. Aspen initiation was closely aligned with large-scale resource impacts of the late 19th century. During the 20th century a moist climate pattern generally favored shade-tolerant conifers. Additionally, results from nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMS) ordination indicate a primary successional gradient in determining lichen communities, but also revealed a significant gradient of more recent impacts from nitrogen loading originating from local ammonia (NH3) sources. While advancing succession generally favors lichen diversity, our findings suggest that medium-distance transport (10-50 km) of local air pollutants is already contributing to altered lichen communities. Overall, there are strong ties between landscape-level disturbance history and present aspen-dependent species assemblages. Effects on the epiphytic community are viewed as symptomatic of greater biodiversity and ecosystem impacts.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Paul C. Rogers et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Reporting Plan for the Forest Health Monitoring Program of the USDA Forest Service: Guidelines for State, Multi-State and National Reports</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/35</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/paul_rogers/35</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:15:35 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>J. Steinman et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
