Do Norms Still Matter? The Corrosive Effects of Globalization on the Vitality of Norms
Abstract
This article considers the ways that the processes of globalization can erode the power of social norms. First, I argue that because individuals in a globalizing community typically suffer from significant disruptions in relationships, the community's ability to regulate itself is eroded. In vibrant communities, residents are willing to intervene in the lives of their neighbors by, for example, scolding children who misbehave in public or teenagers who deface buildings. But in a globalizing community, the conditions that give rise to this willingness to intervene are eroded by the process of globalization. Second, I argue that globalization can distort the process of creating and enforcing social norms by allowing individuals to, in effect, immunize themselves from the sanctions typically employed to enforce norms. For example, differences in social status affect the ways that observers judge illicit behavior, and the ways that they condemn, condone, or ignore that behavior. Third, I argue that globalization also makes it possible for individuals to engage in what I call reputational segmentation. In this process, people who wish to engage in an activity that carries social sanctions do so in a place where they are immune to the real effects of those sanctions.
Suggested Citation
Patrick J. Keenan. "Do Norms Still Matter? The Corrosive Effects of Globalization on the Vitality of Norms" Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 41 (2008): 327-379.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/patrick_keenan/2