Article
Political Influence and Career Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative Review by the Spanish Supreme Court
Journal of Empirical Legal Studies
(2012)
Abstract
This paper develops an empirical analysis of judicial behavior in the Spanish Supreme Court, a court of law dominated by career judiciary. We focus on administrative review. The evidence seems to confirm that a career judiciary is not strongly politically aligned and favors consensus, formalism and dissent avoidance. Notwithstanding, we detect a significant relationship between the decisions of the Court and the interest of the government. We suggest that our empirical analysis makes a significant contribution to undermine the myth of political insulation by career judges. Unlike previous literature, however, we argue and illustrate that judicial politicization can be consistent with consensus and dissent avoidance.
Keywords
- : career judges,
- judicial behavior,
- empirical legal studies,
- Spanish Supreme Court,
- justice rapporteur,
- ideology
Publication Date
2012
Citation Information
Nuno Garoupa, Marian Gili and Fernando Gómez-Pomar. "Political Influence and Career Judges: An Empirical Analysis of Administrative Review by the Spanish Supreme Court" Journal of Empirical Legal Studies Vol. 9 Iss. 4 (2012) p. 795 - 826 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/nunogaroupa/67/