<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Nancy B. Rapoport</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/nancy_rapoport</link>
<description>Recent documents in Nancy B. Rapoport</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:33:06 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	



<item>
<title>The Corporate Lawyer&apos;s Role in a Contemporary Democracy</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/nancy_rapoport/43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/nancy_rapoport/43</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:23:15 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In this paper, we review the traditional arguments for corporate social responsibility and ask the question of what corporate lawyers should do to help their clients do the right thing ethically. We also set out a test - the technically test - that highlights when something is usually on the wrong side of the ethical line. (If you have to give legal advice starting with, Well, technically..., you're on the wrong side of the line.)</description>

<author>Nancy B. Rapoport</author>


<category>Corporate ethics</category>

<category>General corporate law</category>

</item>




</channel>
</rss>
