Skip to main content
Other
Brief Of The John Marshall Law School Veterans Legal Support Center & Clinic as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner, Ortiz v. United States of America (Supreme Court of the United States 2015) (No. 15-488)
Court Documents and Proposed Legislation
  • Michael P. Seng, The John Marshall Law School
  • Brian Clauss
  • Edward Farmer
  • John Marshall Law School Veterans Legal Support Center & Clinic, John Marshall Law School Veterans Legal Support Center & Clinic
Document Type
Brief
Publication Date
1-1-2015
Disciplines
Abstract

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Does the Federal Tort Claims Act's (“FTCA”) allow children of active duty mothers to bring birth injury claims against the federal government as the Fourth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuits have held, or should the Feres doctrine be expanded to bar a child's birth injury claim when government negligence injures the child of an active duty mother, as the Tenth Circuit has held? 2. Does treating birth injury claims of the children of active duty military mothers differently than the children of active duty military fathers constitute unconstitutional gender discrimination?

Citation Information
Brief Of The John Marshall Law School Veterans Legal Support Center & Clinic as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner, Ortiz v. United States of America (Supreme Court of the United States 2015) (No. 15-488)