Historicism in narrative reviews of strategic management research
Interim status: Citation only.
Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., Buckley, M. R., & Adams, G. L. (2008). Historicism in narrative reviews of strategic management research. Journal of management history, 14(4), 334-347.
Access the publisher's website.
2008 HERDC submission. FoR Code: 1503
© Copyright Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2008
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a comprehensive analysis of methodological issues that accompany the articles reviewing past research in strategic management.
Design/methodology/approach – The topic of the philosophical underpinnings and implications of historicism in strategy reviews is examined by contrasting and explaining deterministic, indeterministic, and underdeterministic views of strategy's intellectual history.
Findings – Three diverse philosophical approaches to historicist interpretation are found to be embedded in key review articles in the field of strategic management.
Practical implications – This paper indicates the need to develop and teach an accepted methodology of systematically reviewing and interpreting available knowledge in strategic management.
Originality/value – The unique contribution of this paper is that it indicates new paths that are important not only for the development of an alternative way to construct a shared history of the subject but also for the development of common norms for review articles that could help to advance strategic management scholarship.
Milorad M. Novicevic, Michael G. Harvey, M. Ronald Buckley, and Garry L. Adams. "Historicism in narrative reviews of strategic management research" Business papers (2008).
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/michael_harvey/25
This document is currently not available here.