<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Michael Carasik</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2010  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik</link>
<description>Recent documents in Michael Carasik</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:31:37 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	







<item>
<title>Why Did Hannah Ask for “Seed of Men”?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/19</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/19</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 15:43:23 PDT</pubDate>
<description>I am suggesting in this article that what Hannah asked for in the original telling of this story was not זרע אנשים but זרע אלהים, a child that would be given her by God.  The difficult phrase זרע אנשים is an artifact, placed in her mouth by a kind of Tiqqun Soferim, a reflexive correction of Hannah’s request by a scribe who (perhaps) misunderstood it and (certainly) found it uncomfortable.</description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>To See a Sound: A Deuteronomic Rereading of Exodus 20:15</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/18</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/18</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:12:02 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In his chapter on inner-biblical exegesis in The Garments of Torah, Michael Fishbane says that his purpose is &quot;to suggest some of the ways by which the foundation document of Judaism, the Hebrew Bible, not only sponsored a monumental culture of textual exegesis, but was itself its own first product.&quot;  I believe that this assertion is indeed correct.  In this article, I sharpen it in two ways: first, by pointing out the locus of the Bible's invention of itself, Deuteronomy 4; second, by pointing to the act of exegesis—a Deuteronomic midrash on the phrase from Exodus 20 that describes the Israelites as &quot;seeing&quot; the thunder—that provided the creative spark that transformed theological energy into textual matter and (ultimately) gave us the Bible.</description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Deuteronomy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Three Biblical Beginnings</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/17</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/17</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:22:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The purpose of this paper is to highlight the process of literary shaping as it took place in the Bible, by a discussion of three biblical beginnings—a beginning at the beginning (Genesis 1), a beginning in the middle (1 Samuel 1), and a beginning at the end (2 Chronicles 36).</description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>A Deuteronomic Voice in the Joseph Story</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/16</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/16</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:13:11 PDT</pubDate>
<description>In this article, I hope to show that a distinctively Deuteronomic voice can be heard in the Joseph story. This voice makes itself known both in Deuteronomic language and in a particular Deuteronomic attitude, one that has been neglected as a tool for discovering Deuteronomic influence in other books of the Bible—Deuteronomy’s psychological orientation.  Focusing on these two elements of what the writer of Deuteronomy sounds like, I hope to demonstrate that, despite the origins of the Joseph story primarily in the J, E, and P sources, the writer who composed it was indeed influenced throughout by a Deuteronomic outlook.</description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

<category>Deuteronomy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Exegetical Implications of the Masoretic Cantillation Marks in Ecclesiastes</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/15</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/15</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:54:46 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Jewish biblical commentary</category>

<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

<category>wisdom literature</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Syntactic Double Translation in the Targumim</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/14</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/14</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:49:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Jewish biblical commentary</category>

<category>Targum</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Who Were the &quot;Men of Hezekiah&quot; (Proverbs XXV 1)?, by Michael Carasik  ©  BRILL.</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/13</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/13</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:57:55 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

<category>wisdom literature</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Limits of Omniscience</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/12</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:52:51 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Can the God of the Hebrew Bible read minds? Contrary to popular belief, most biblical texts suggest that God cannot, but several narrative texts insist that God can. This observation prompts a second and broader question: To what extent are the theologies that appear to be operative in various biblical texts actually shaped by literary imperatives?</description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Transcending the Boundary of Death: Ecclesiastes through a Nabokovian Lens</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/11</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:48:57 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Ch. 12 of Ecclesiastes depicts a scene that combines elements of the death of a person with others that describe the death of an entire world. Vladimir Nabokov's novel Invitation to a Beheading ends with a similar scene. Both Nabokov's writings and his biography suggest that he shared Qohelet's view of life &quot;under the sun&quot; as hevel, but his own experience as a creator led him to believe that there is a higher-order reality than our own. The literary technique described here was Nabokov's attempt to show how one might cross the boundary into that higher reality. With a particular focus on Nabokov's novel Pale Fire, I will argue that the parallel to Ecclesiastes suggests that the writer of Eccl. 12:9-14 was also the writer of that entire book, who chose to drop the persona of Qohelet at the end of his book and speak as himself, to burst through the boundaries of death (in 12:7) and offer a view of the world that the Qohelet persona could not perceive.</description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

<category>wisdom literature</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Qohelet’s Twists and Turns</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/10</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:36:56 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Biblical texts regularly emphasize following the straight path that is marked out by God’s teachings. Just as in English, ‘straightness’ is   prized as ‘right’ and ‘crookedness’ scorned as perverse. This quality is praised both in action and in thought. By contrast,  Qohelet’s search for wisdom is specifically expressed in language which gives turning, not straightness, the highest value. This study explores how Qohelet   uses words and images of turning to express both what he has learned and how he has learned about the world, as well as how circularity is an  element not merely of Qohelet’s thought, but of his style.</description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

<category>wisdom literature</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Translator, Commentator, Writer</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/9</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:32:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Jewish biblical commentary</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Theologies of the Mind in Biblical Israel</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/8</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:28:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Jewish biblical commentary</category>

<category>Biblical exegesis</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Commentators&apos; Bible (Leviticus)</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/7</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:23:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Jewish biblical commentary</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Commentators&apos; Bible (Exodus)</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/6</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:20:50 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


<category>Jewish biblical commentary</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Review of Miller and Hayes, A History of Ancient  Israel and Judah (2nd ed.)</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/5</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:16:04 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Review of Borodowski, Isaac Abravanel on Miracles, Creation, Prophecy and Evil</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/4</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:14:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Review of Nam, Talking About God: Job 42:7-9 and the Nature of God in the Book of Job</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/3</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:12:42 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Review of  Waltke, The Book of Proverbs (NICOT)</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/2</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:09:33 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Review of Leuchter.  The Polemics of Exile in Jeremiah 26-45</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/michael_carasik/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:00:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Michael Carasik</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>

