Skip to main content
Popular Press
Coal in Court: Whitehaven, Climate Change, and Civil Disobedience
The Conversation (2013)
  • Matthew Rimmer, Australian National University College of Law
Abstract
The future of Whitehaven Coal’s Maules Creek mine has become a legal issue. The mine’s approval is being challenged in Federal Court; the company’s representatives say if the approval is overturned, they will ask the new Minister for the Environment to “cure the error … and grant a new approval”.
And next Tuesday the “Whitehaven hoaxer”, Jonathan Moylan, will appear before Sydney’s Downing Centre Local Court to hear whether his actions to draw attention to the mine were unlawful.
Of late, there has been a series of battles over climate change, culture-jamming and civil disobedience. The Fossil Fuel Resistance has increasingly used tactics and strategies such as hoaxes, impersonation, and identity correction. The courts have been forced to tackle complex legal questions involving civil disobedience and its place in the politics of climate change.
Keywords
  • Copyright Law,
  • Trademark Law,
  • Culture-Jamming,
  • Parody,
  • Satire,
  • Hoax,
  • Environment,
  • Climate Change.
Publication Date
July 19, 2013
Citation Information
Matthew Rimmer. "Coal in Court: Whitehaven, Climate Change, and Civil Disobedience" The Conversation (2013)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/matthew_rimmer/158/