<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Mark Edwards</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards</link>
<description>Recent documents in Mark Edwards</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2012 14:37:44 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Childhood sexual abuse and substance abuse in relation to depression and coping</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/7</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:33:47 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Relationships between Childhood Sexual Abuse (CSA), substance abuse, substance abuse relapse, depression and coping styles were examined in an Australian sample. Participants were 79 adults actively seeking treatment for substance abuse or CSA. CSA and substance use history were assessed using a purpose built questionnaire. Depression was assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory Second Edition (BDI-II), and coping styles were evaluated using the Coping Scale for Adults. Among substance abusers, self-reported CSA history was associated with (1) severe depression; (2) less optimistic coping; (3) longer duration of substance abuse; and (4) the use of drugs to alleviate negative moods. A non-substanceabusing CSA group was remarkably similar to the CSA substance-abusing group on all measures. Penetrative abuse, younger age at CSA onset, and lack of confidence in dealing with CSA were associated with more severe depression in CSA victims. Implications for therapy and suggestions for future research are discussed.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Sonja Lee et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Selective attention for masked and unmasked threatening words in anxiety: Effects of trait anxiety, state anxiety and awareness</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/6</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 11 Sep 2011 22:29:39 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We investigated the effects of awareness on selective attention for masked and unmasked verbal threat material using a computerised version of the emotional Stroop. Participants were assigned to the high trait anxious (HTA) and low trait anxious (LTA) groups on the basis of questionnaire scores, and state anxiety was manipulated within participants through the threat of electric shock. To investigate the effects of awareness on responses to threat, the mode of exposure was blocked such that half the participants received masked trials before the unmasked trials, whereas the other half received the reverse order. The results revealed that there was no difference between the HTA and LTA groups in responses to threat for those who received the masked trials before the unmasked trials. However, when unmasked trials were presented before the masked trials HTA individuals were significantly slower to respond to both masked and unmasked threat words compared to the LTA group, and these effects were not further modified by participants' state anxiety status. The results are discussed in terms of the automatic nature of threat processing in anxiety.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mark S. Edwards et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Selective attention for masked and unmasked emotionally toned stimuli: Effects of trait anxiety, state anxiety, and test order</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:23:28 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We investigated selective attention for masked and unmasked, threat, and positively valenced words, in high trait anxious (HTA) and low trait anxious (LTA) individuals using the emotional Stroop colour-naming task. State anxiety was varied within participants through the threat of electric shock. To investigate whether the sequencing of the state anxiety manipulation affected colour-naming latencies, the ordering of the shock threat and shock safe conditions was counterbalanced across participants. The results indicated that the ordering of the state anxiety manipulation moderated masked and unmasked threat bias effects. Specifically, relative to LTA individuals, HTA individuals showed a threat interference effect, but this effect was limited to those who performed under the threat of shock in the later stages of the experiment. Irrespective of exposure mode and state anxiety status, all individuals showed interference for threat in the early stages of the experiment, relative to a threat facilitation effect in the later stages of the experiment. For the unmasked trials alone, the data also revealed a significant threat interference effect for the HTA group relative to the LTA group in the shock threat condition, and this effect was evident irrespective of shock threat order. The results are discussed with respect to the automatic nature of emotional processing in anxiety.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mark S. Edwards et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>An increase in stimulus arousal has differential effects on the processing speed of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/5</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:23:28 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The arousal value of a stimulus influences its salience, whereby higher arousal should lead to faster processing. However, in previous research, participants consistently made faster valence judgments for low arousal, pleasant stimuli than for high arousal, pleasant stimuli. The speed of valence and arousal judgments for pictures and words were investigated in three experiments. Valence judgments were faster for low arousal than for high arousal pleasant pictures and for high arousal than for low arousal unpleasant pictures and words. Moreover, arousal judgments were faster for low arousal than high arousal pleasant and for high arousal than low arousal unpleasant pictures and words. The current research confirms that the impact of valence and arousal on processing speed does not reflect on the labels (valence versus arousal) used when recording speeded judgments. Similarly to valence, stimulus arousal interacts differentially with the evaluation of pleasant and unpleasant stimuli producing a processing advantage for high arousal, unpleasant stimuli but not high arousal, pleasant stimuli.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Helena M. Purkis et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: The misinformation effect reconsidered</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 20:02:45 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Research in semantic word list-learning paradigms suggests that presentation modality during encoding may influence word recognition at test. Given these findings, it is argued that some previous misinformation effect research might contain methodologies which are problematic. Misleading information groups typically receive erroneous information in written narratives, which may be further impeded by written tests. Results may therefore be explained by misinformation or encoding specificity. In two experiments, participants received restated, neutral, and misleading post-event information through auditory or written modalities. Participants' recognition and recall of critical details about the source event were tested. In a recognition test using the standard testing procedure, there were no condition differences for post-event information presented via an auditory modality. However, for post-event information presented in the text modality, recognition performance was more accurate for restated information relative to neutral information, which in-turn was better than the misled condition. Using the modified testing procedure, the differences were again limited to the text condition. Better performance was evident in the restated condition relative to the average of the neutral and the misled conditions, and there was no difference in performance between the neutral and the misled conditions. Using a recall test, however, there was no effect of modality. Memory was significantly better for restated information than for the average of the neutral and the misled conditions and poorer in the misled condition relative to the neutral condition. Results are discussed in terms of the effects of contextual cues at test, and methodological and interpretational limitations associated with previous research.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Justine M. Campbell et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Effect of instructed extinction on verbal and autonomic indices of pavlovian learning with fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant conditional stimuli</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/2</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:58:41 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>We investigated the effects of conditional stimulus fear-relevance and of instructed extinction on human Pavlovian conditioning as indexed by electrodermal responses and verbal ratings of conditional stimulus unpleasantness. Half of the participants (n = 64) were trained with pictures of snakes and spiders (fear-relevant) as conditional stimuli, whereas the others were trained with pictures of flowers and mushrooms (fear-irrelevant) in a differential aversive Pavlovian conditioning procedure. Half of the participants in each group were instructed after the completion of acquisition that no more unconditional stimuli were to be presented. Extinction of differential electrodermal responses required more trials after training with fear-relevant pictures. Moreover, there was some evidence that verbal instructions did not affect extinction of second interval electrodermal responses to fear-relevant pictures. However, neither fear-relevance nor instructions affected the changes in rated conditional stimulus pleasantness. This dissociation across measures is interpreted as reflecting renewal of Pavlovian learning.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Ottmar Lipp et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Selective processing of masked and unmasked verbal threat material in anxiety: Influence of an immediate acute stressor</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/mark_edwards/1</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:55:43 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Attentional biases for threat were investigated using a computerised version of the emotional Stroop task.  The study examined the influence of state and trait anxiety by employing a student sample assigned to high trait anxious (HTA; n=32) or low trait anxious (LTA; n=32) groups on the basis of questionnaire scores, and state anxiety was manipulated within participants through the threat of electric shock.  Threatening words that were either unrelated (e.g., cancer, danger) or related to the threat of shock (e.g., electrocute, shock) were presented to participants both within and outside of awareness.  In the latter condition a backward masking procedure was used to prevent awareness and exposure thresholds between the target and mask were individually set for each participant.  For unmasked trials the HTA group showed significant interference in colour naming for all threat words relative to control words when performing under the threat of shock, but not in the shock safe condition.  For the masked trials, despite chance performance in being able to identify the lexical staus of the items, HTA participants showed facilitated colour naming for all threat words relative to control items when performing under threat of shock, but this effect was not evident in the shock safe condition.  Neither valence of the items nor the threat of shock influenced colour naming latencies in either exposure mode for the LTA group. © 2006 Psychology Press Ltd.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Mark Edwards et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
