Skip to main content
Article
Reading Dewey’s Political Philosophy Through Addams’s Political Compromises
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
  • Marilyn Fischer, University of Dayton
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2013
Abstract

Both John Dewey and Jane Addams believed that the cure for the ills of democracy is more democracy. While their vision of democracy is rightly called radical, the processes through which they proposed to cure the ills of democracy are in large measure conservative, in the classical, Burkean sense of the term. To show this, I first explain how well their political philosophies line up, particularly their proposals for political reconstruction. I then use Addams’s experiences as a delegate to the 1912 Progressive Party Convention as a test case in real time for Dewey’s proposals for political reconstruction. The compromises she made there demonstrate the Burkean conservative character of the process of pragmatist change, as well as reveal how the tragic resides within pragmatist efforts at social reconstruction.

Inclusive pages
227-243
ISBN/ISSN
1051-3558
Document Version
Postprint
Comments

The document available for download is the author's accepted manuscript, provided in compliance with the publisher's policy on self-archiving. Differences may exist between this document and the published version, available using the link provided. Permission documentation is on file.

Publisher
American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Citation Information
Marilyn Fischer. "Reading Dewey’s Political Philosophy Through Addams’s Political Compromises" American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly Vol. 87 Iss. 2 (2013)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/marilyn_fischer/27/