Introduction of Jack B. Weinstein, 38 Seton Hall L. Rev. 861 (2008)

Link

From the Wrong End of the Telescope: A Response to Professor David Bernstein, 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1983 (2006)

Link

Introduction [Symposium: Science For Judges IV: Agent Orange and Research on Human Behavior], 15 J.L. & Pol’y. 1 (2006)

The Impact of DNA Exonerations on the Criminal Justice System, 34 J.L. Med. & Ethics 320 (2006)

Link

Introduction [Symposium: Science For Judges III: Maintaining the Integrity of Scientific Research and Forensic Evidence in Criminal Proceedings], 13 J.L. & Pol’y. 1 (2005)

Link

Uncertainty and Informed Choice: Unmasking Daubert (with Aaron Twerski), 104 Mich. L. Rev. 257 (2005)

What Has a Decade of Daubert Wrought?, 95 Am. J. Pub. Health S59, Supp. 1 (2005)

Link

Introduction [Symposium: Science For Judges II: The Practice of Epidemiology and Administrative Agency Created Science], 12 J.L. & Pol’y 485 (2004)

Link

Expert Testimony in Criminal Proceedings: Questions Daubert Does Not Answer, 33 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1125 (2003)

Link

Introduction [Symposium: Science For Judges I: Papers on Toxicology and Epidemiology], 12 J.L. & Pol’y. 1 (2003)

Link

Judge Jack B. Weinstein, Tort Litigation, and the Public Good: A Roundtable Discussion to Honor One of America’s Great Trial Judges on the Occasion of his 80th Birthday [Participant], 12 J.L. & Pol’y. 149 (2003)

Link

Introduction [Symposium: DNA Lessons From the Past -- Problems for the Future] (with Bailey H. Kuklin), 67 Brook. L. Rev. 1 (2001)

Link

Upsetting The Balance Between Adverse Interests: The Impact of The Supreme Court's Trilogy on Expert Testimony in Toxic Tort Litigation, 64 Law & Contemp. Probs. 289 (2001)

Link

When is Clinical Psychology Like Astrology?, 33 Ariz. St. L.J. 75 (2001)

"Expert Testimony: The Supreme Court's Rules [reprinted in 6 BLS LawNotes 28 (Winter 2001)], 16 Issues Sci. & Tech. 57 (2000)

Link

Eliminating General Causation: Notes Towards a New Theory of Justice and Toxic Torts, 97 Colum. L. Rev. 2117 (1997)

Link

Laboratory Error Seen Through the Lens of Science and Policy, 30 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1081 (1997)

How Would or Should the Supreme Court Interpret the Definitions in Rule 801 [essay written as part of electronic Hearsay Symposium held on the Internet, Summer 1995], 16 Miss. L.J. 13, 99, 103 (1995)

Novel Forensic Evidence: The Need for Court-Appointed Experts after Daubert, 1 Shepard's Expert & Sci. Evidence Q. 487 (1994)

Link

Procedural Paradigms for Applying the Daubert Test, 78 Minn. L. Rev. 1345 (1994)

Link

Rethinking the Applicability of Evidentiary Rules at Sentencing: Of Relevant Conduct and Hearsay and the Need for an Infield Fly Rule, 5 Fed. Sent. R. 96 (1992)

Link

The Deconstitutionalization of the Confrontation Clause: A Proposal for a Prosecutorial Restraint Model, 76 Minn. L. Rev. 557 (1992)

Link

When, If Ever, Does Evidentiary Error Constitute Reversible Error?, 25 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 893 (1992)

Screening Expert Testimony: The Court's Role, 1 Prod. Liab. L.J. 253 (1989)

Link

United States v. Scop: The Common Law Approach to an Expert's Opinion about a Witness's Credibility Still Does Not Work, 55 Brook. L. Rev. 559 (1989)

Link

A Relevancy Approach to Novel Scientific Evidence, 26 Jurimetrics J. 245 (1986)

Link

The Federal Rules of Evidence: Defining and Refining the Goals of Codification, 12 Hofstra L. Rev. 255 (1984)

Link

Commentary: The Privileges Article in the New York Proposed Code of Evidence, 47 Brook. L. Rev. 1405 (1981)

Link

Other Crimes Evidence: A Unified Approach to Severance and Admissibility, 45 Brook. L. Rev. 1117 (1979)

Link

Introduction to a Symposium on the Federal Rules of Evidence, 5 Hofstra L. Rev. 1 (1976)

Link

Privileges, Presumptions and Competency of Witnesses in the Federal Court: A Federal Choice-of-Laws Rule, 42 Brook. L. Rev. 417 (1976)

Link

An Introduction to the Federal Rules of Evidence, 2 Litigation 8 (1975)

Link

How the Privilege for Governmental Information Met Its Watergate, 25 Case W. Res. L. Rev. 747 (1975)

Link

Basic Rules of Relevancy in the Proposed Federal Rules of Evidence (with J. B. Weinstein), 4 Ga. L. Rev. 43 (1969)

Student Edition of Weinstein’s Evidence Manual (with J.B. Weinstein) (2005)

Postconviction DNA Testing: Recommendations for Handling Requests (National Committee on the Future of DNA Evidence, reporter) (1999)

Student Edition of Weinstein's Evidence Manual (with J. B. Weinstein) (1999)

Evidence: Cases and Materials (with J. B. Weinstein, J. Mansfield, and N. Abrams) (1997)

Science and Technology in Judicial Decision Making: Creating Opportunities and Meeting Challenges: A Report of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government (1993)

Procedural and Evidentiary Mechanisms for Dealing with Experts in Toxic Tort Litigation: A Critique and Proposal: A Consultant Report (1991)

Cases and Materials on Evidence (with J. B. Weinstein, J. Mansfield, and N. Abrams) (1988)

Weinstein's Evidence Manual: A Guide to the United States Rules Based on Weinstein's Evidence (& Supp., 1987-) (with J. B. Weinstein) (1987)

Litigation on Behalf of Women: A Review for the Ford Foundation (1980)

Weinstein's Evidence: Commentary on Rules of Evidence for the United States Courts and Magistrates (& Supp., 1975- ) (with J. B. Weinstein) (1975)

Research on Eyewitness Testimony and False Confessions, Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom (2008)

Evidence Law to Protect the Civil Defendant, but Not the Accused , Law and Class in America: Trends Since the Cold War (2006)

Lessons From DNA: Restriking the Balance Between Finality and Justice, DNA and the Criminal Justice System: The Technology of Justice (2004)

Raising the Bar: The Impact of DNA Testing on the Field of Forensics , Perspectives on Crime and Justice: 2000-2001 Lecture Series (2002)

Conceptions of Science: Defining the Disconnect [Panelist] , National Conference on Science and the Law Proceedings (2000)

The Supreme Court's Trilogy on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony , Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (2000)

Evidentiary Framework, Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence (1994)

Link

Converting Unknown Risk into Phantom Risk (reviewing K.R. Foster, D.E. Bernstein, and P.W. Huber eds., Phantom Risk: Scientific Inference and the Law (1999)), Books-on-Law (1999)

Link

Teaching U.S. Evidence Law in the 21st Century (edited version of a speech given at the Evidence Section of 1999 AALS annual meeting), International Commentary on Evidence (1999)

Brooklyn's Seminar Sections Reap Early Benefits, Syllabus (1988)

Brief of the American Civil Liberties Union as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Petitioner (Lilly v. Virginia) (1999)

Brief of Margaret A. Berger, Edward J. Imwinkelried, and Stephen A. Saltzburg as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents (Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael) (1998)

Brief of Law Professors Paul F. Rothstein, Ronald J. Allen, Margaret A. Berger ... as Amici Curiae in Support of the Petitioner (Office of the President v.Office of Independent Counsel) (1997)

Brief of the Carnegie Commission on Science, Technology, and Government as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party (Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals) (1992)

Brief of the American Civil Liberties as Amicus Curiae in Support of the Respondent (Idaho v. Wright) (1990)