Rules of Engagement: Residents' Perceptions of the In-training Evaluation Process
Dr. Lorelei Lingard is currently a faculty member at The University of Western Ontario.
BACKGROUND: In-training evaluation reports (ITERs) often fall short of their goals of promoting resident learning and development. Efforts to address this problem through faculty development and assessment-instrument modification have been disappointing. The authors explored residents' experiences and perceptions of the ITER process to gain insight into why the process succeeds or fails.
METHOD: Using a grounded theory approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with 20 residents. Constant comparative analysis for emergent themes was conducted.
RESULTS: All residents identified aspects of "engagement" in the ITER process as the dominant influence on the success of ITERs. Both external (evaluator-driven, such as evaluator credibility) and internal (resident-driven, such as self-assessment) influences on engagement were elaborated. When engagement was lacking, residents viewed the ITER process as inauthentic.
CONCLUSIONS: Engagement is a critical factor to consider when seeking to improve ITER use. Our articulation of external and internal influences on engagement provides a starting point for targeted interventions.
Christopher J. Watling, Cynthia F. Kenyon, Elaine M. Zibrowski, Valerie Schulz, Mark A. Goldszmidt, Indu Singh, Heather L. Maddocks, and Lorelei Lingard. "Rules of Engagement: Residents' Perceptions of the In-training Evaluation Process" Academic Medicine 83.10 Suppl (2008): 97-100.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/loreleilingard/30