<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lisa A. Palmer</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer</link>
<description>Recent documents in Lisa A. Palmer</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:49:50 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	




<item>
<title>Trends in health sciences library and information science research: an analysis of research publications in the &lt;em&gt;Bulletin of the Medical Library Association&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;Journal of the Medical Library Association&lt;/em&gt; from 1991 to 2007</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/12</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 07:57:50 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
OBJECTIVE: This study analyzed trends in research activity as represented in the published research in the leading peer-reviewed professional journal for health sciences librarianship.

METHODOLOGY: Research articles were identified from the Bulletin of the Medical Library Association and Journal of the Medical Library Association (1991-2007). Using content analysis and bibliometric techniques, data were collected for each article on the (1) subject, (2) research method, (3) analytical technique used, (4) number of authors, (5) number of citations, (6) first author affiliation, and (7) funding source. The results were compared to a previous study, covering the period 1966 to 1990, to identify changes over time. 

RESULTS: Of the 930 articles examined, 474 (51%) were identified as research articles. Survey (n = 174, 37.1%) was the most common methodology employed, quantitative descriptive statistics (n = 298, 63.5%) the most used analytical technique, and applied topics (n = 332, 70%) the most common type of subject studied. The majority of first authors were associated with an academic health sciences library (n = 264, 55.7%). Only 27.4% (n = 130) of studies identified a funding source.

CONCLUSION: This study's findings demonstrate that progress is being made in health sciences librarianship research. There is, however, room for improvement in terms of research methodologies used, proportion of applied versus theoretical research, and elimination of barriers to conducting research for practicing librarians.</description>

<author>Sally A. Gore</author>


<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Library Science</category>

<category>Research</category>

<category>Publishing</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Digitizing Dissertations for an Institutional Repository: A Process and Cost Analysis</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/11</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:15 PST</pubDate>
<description>Objective: This paper describes the Lamar Soutter Library's process and costs associated with digitizing 300 doctoral dissertations for a newly implemented institutional repository at the University of Massachusetts Medical School. 

Methodology: Project tasks included identifying metadata elements, obtaining and tracking permissions, converting the dissertations to an electronic format, and coordinating workflow between library departments.  Each dissertation was scanned, reviewed for quality control, enhanced with a table of contents, processed through an optical character recognition (OCR) function, and added to the institutional repository.

Results: Three hundred and twenty dissertations were digitized and added to the repository for a cost of $23,562, or $0.28 per page.  Seventy-four percent of the authors who were contacted (n=282) granted permission to digitize their dissertations.  Processing time per title was 170 minutes, for a total processing time of 906 hours.  In the first 17 months, full-text dissertations in the collection were downloaded 17,555 times.  

Conclusion: Locally digitizing dissertations or other scholarly works for inclusion into institutional repositories can be cost effective, especially if small defined projects are chosen. A successful project serves as an excellent recruitment strategy for the institutional repository and helps libraries build new relationships.  Challenges include workflow, cost, developing policies, and obtaining copyright permissions.  </description>

<author>Mary E. Piorun</author>


<category>Libraries, Digital</category>

<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>University of Massachusetts Medical School</category>

<category>Lamar Soutter Library</category>

<category>Institutional repositories</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Digitizing Dissertations for the eScholarship@UMMS Institutional Repository</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/9</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:14 PST</pubDate>
<description>
Our presentation will describe the process and costs associated with our first digitization project: digitizing 300 doctoral dissertations for a newly implemented institutional repository at UMass Medical School.  We will start at the beginning: selecting team members and identifying their roles, choosing the right repository system, and identifying a manageable first project.  We will explain how we partnered with our Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and contacted alumni for permission to digitize their dissertations.  We will also discuss technical information and decisions such as software and equipment used to scan and create searchable text, using OCR technology to convert abstracts, deciding what metadata to collect, and how to re-use data from our OPAC.  We will describe workflow and skill level of staff members and the coordination required between the Library's Systems and Technical Services departments.  Finally we will present the costs associated with this work.  We conclude that locally digitizing dissertations or other scholarly works for inclusion into institutional repositories can be cost effective and an excellent recruitment strategy for the institutional repository.

Presented October 28, 2008 in Worcester, Mass., at the program &#34;Introduction to Library Digitization&#34; sponsored by the Massachusetts Library Association's Technical Services Section.</description>

<author>Mary E. Piorun</author>


<category>University of Massachusetts Medical School</category>

<category>Lamar Soutter Library</category>

<category>Digitization</category>

<category>Institutional repositories</category>

<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Libraries, Digital</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Anatomy of a Digitization Project: Dissecting the Process</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/10</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:14 PST</pubDate>
<description>
Objective:This poster describes the Library's first digitization project: digitizing 300 doctoral dissertations in-house for an institutional repository.  The Library hopes to provide a showcase for the medical school's research, teaching, and scholarship; promote open access to research; and make available an easy way for faculty and researchers to promote and distribute their work.

Method:The Library Director established a team to investigate institutional repository products.  The team created a chart assigning weights to important criteria in order to evaluate various systems.  In 2006 the Library purchased a license for ProQuest Digital Commons, a hosted system.  As a manageable first project, the team focused on digitizing the 300 dissertations produced by one of the graduate schools.  The intent was to populate the repository quickly, generate visibility, and gain support across the medical school.  The team worked with the graduate school to develop a permissions form and a process to contact alumni.  The Library Director decided to scan the dissertations in-house rather than outsource.  The team made technical decisions about software and equipment for scanning and creating searchable text, using OCR technology, deciding what metadata to collect, and how to reuse data from the library's OPAC.

Results:The project is currently well under budget.  As of February 2007, more than 65% of the alumni contacted have given permission for their dissertations to be digitized.  The 247 dissertations added to the repository have been downloaded more than 6300 times in just eight months.  The project was profiled in the school's internal newsletter, leading to increased visibility and interest.  Another graduate school recently agreed to deposit their dissertations in the repository.  Continued challenges include workflow, documenting policies and procedures, managing copyright issues, and creating a plan to market and promote the repository on campus.

Conclusion:The Library's first digitization project has been successful due to library funding, support, and management; the skills of team members; the purchase of a hosted product; and the partnership with the graduate school.  Future success will be indicated by continued funding, increased faculty and department participation, and greater campus awareness.

Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, on May 20, 2007.</description>

<author>Mary E. Piorun</author>


<category>University of Massachusetts Medical School</category>

<category>Lamar Soutter Library</category>

<category>Library materials -- Digitization</category>

<category>Institutional repositories</category>

<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Dissertations, Academic</category>

<category>Project management</category>

<category>Libraries, Digital</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Levels Program: A Career Ladder for Support Staff</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/7</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:13 PST</pubDate>
<description>
Objective
How do we manage support staff development in the modern health sciences library? Increasingly, the need for more highly skilled staff is evident. This poster describes a three phase project encompassing the development, approval, and implementation processes necessary to make a career ladder a reality in a medium-sized academic health sciences library. 

Methods
The Management Team gathered information from library literature and business and government sources as a starting point. In the development phase, the team posed questions as the foundation for developing a competency-based program to manage support staff development. e.g., What will support staff be doing in the future? Can we define the competencies staff will need? How do we create a flexible system that keeps us poised to respond to change? How do we build a skilled work force and prepare current staff to take on new tasks? How do we develop a measurement framework for objective employee evaluation?  In the approval phase, the emphasis was on educating the university's administration, HR, and the union about the library's strategic direction and the benefits of the plan to staff. The implementation phase focused on staff buy-in, roll-out timing, and developing training to ensure success for current and future staff.

Results and Conclusions
Competencies, education, and years of service formed the promotion plan's basis. Managers identified task-based areas of responsibility, divided into achievement stages with frameworks detailed for objective employee evaluation. A policy for advancement, based on performance in multiple areas of responsibility, was developed. The plan allows for growth and promotion, and encourages staff to build a knowledge base across library departments. 

Throughout the planning process the team met with human resources, the union, and administration to explain program goals, as well as to address their concerns and incorporate their input as we developed the program details, resulting in a smooth approval process.  

For implementation, one manager assumed responsibility for coordinating orientation and training development.  The team was surprised by initial negative staff reaction to increased responsibility and the certification/testing requirements. The team continues to face implementation challenges and issues.

Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting on May 18, 2008, in Chicago, IL.</description>

<author>Jane Fama</author>


<category>University of Massachusetts Medical School</category>

<category>Library Administration</category>

<category>Staff Development</category>

<category>Lamar Soutter Library</category>

<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Career Mobility</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Anatomy of an Institutional Repository: Dissecting the Metadata Process</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/8</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:13 PST</pubDate>
<description>In 2006 the Lamar Soutter Library at the University of Massachusetts Medical School licensed ProQuest's Digital Commons institutional repository (IR) software and launched eScholarship@UMMS.  The goals were to provide a showcase for the medical school's research, teaching, and scholarship; promote open access to research; and make available an easy way for faculty and researchers to promote and distribute their work.  To date the Library has established five distinct collections.  Each collection varies in scope and in the way the Library acquires the content.  This variation poses many challenges for metadata creation and maintenance.  Each collection entails the establishment of record templates, metadata requirements, workflow processes, and quality control procedures.  Ongoing work includes assigning medical subject headings and reviewing metadata submitted with the item.  With the IR, the work of Library catalogers is more visible than ever before, especially since the metadata is searched in Google.  This poster will address these content management challenges and successes from the perspective of a medium-sized academic health sciences library just getting started with digitization.  The poster will include displays of records from both the administrative and end-user interfaces, metadata requirements, and usage data. Presented at the American Library Association Annual Conference, Washington, DC, on June 25, 2007.</description>

<author>Lisa A. Palmer</author>


<category>University of Massachusetts Medical School</category>

<category>Metadata</category>

<category>Lamar Soutter Library</category>

<category>Cataloging</category>

<category>Institutional repositories</category>

<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Libraries, Digital</category>

<category>Library materials--Digitization</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Trends in Health Sciences Library and Information Science Research</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/6</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:12 PST</pubDate>
<description>Objective:  Determine if the profession of health librarianship has matured over recent years as defined by the level of sophistication found in the published research in the leading peer-reviewed, professional journal.

Method: A content analysis of research articles published in Bulletin of the Medical Library Association and Journal of the Medical Library Association during the time span of 1991-2007 will be performed.  For those articles that are classified as research, the subjects, research methodologies and analytical techniques employed will be identified, as well as bibliometric characteristics, institutional affiliation, and research funding source.  The data will be analyzed using descriptive and quantitative inferential statistics to identify trends and/or gaps in the literature.  The subject, research method, and analytical classification schema used throughout the study will be based on the work of Alexandra Dimitroff.

Results &#38; Conclusion:  Preliminary findings reflect articles published from 1991-1996 (n = 310). Forty six percent of the articles reviewed were defined as research. The most predominant research methodology employed was survey (47%) and the most prevalent techniques used to analyze findings were quantitative descriptive statistics (62%). Studies examining subjects related to library users accounted for the greatest number of published research articles (20%), followed in popularity by public services (15%), and materials and/or collection development (9%). Sixty five percent of articles were authored by individuals affiliated with an academic health sciences library. The majority of studies (65%) stated no funding source, while 17% reported government support for the research carried out.   New areas of research observed to date include consumer health, outreach, and the internet; an emerging research method is focus groups.  Additional data on the findings will be presented in May.

Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting on May 19, 2008, in Chicago, IL.</description>

<author>Sally A. Gore</author>


<category>Research</category>

<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Library Science</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Coming Out of the Back Room: Technical Services Breaks Loose</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/5</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:12 PST</pubDate>
<description>Objective: Describe how technical services librarians at an academic medical center have embraced opportunities for campus outreach.  The Library has long been committed to teamwork.  As members of cross-departmental Library teams and campus-wide task forces, technical services librarians have utilized skills in information organization, integrated library systems, and problem solving to benefit colleagues, faculty, clinicians, students, and the public.
Methods: Case study: Since the arrival of a new Director in 1998, much of the work of the Library is accomplished through cross-functional teams.  Technical services librarians have contributed significantly to these teams and to campus-wide task forces.  For a project to create a database of medical images, library catalogers performed crucial roles in developing a database and record structure, maintaining quality control, writing documentation, and training faculty members.  This team is now collaborating with Academic Computing staff to develop an institutional repository.  Within the Library, a cataloger joined an access services team charged with examining the problem of unreturned books, enhancing the team with skills in integrated library systems, problem solving, and report writing.  Recognizing the importance of open access, a technical services librarian organized a well-attended forum and display for the campus and the public.
Results: The positive impact of technical services outreach included new and enhanced services and products, professional satisfaction, improved communication among staff, and better access to library materials.  Technical services librarians are better known to the larger campus community.  Staff development, collaboration, and outreach were enhanced by a Library renovation that kept the Technical Services department in close proximity to public services areas and the Library training room.  In the Library there is now a true partnership with public services staff, and an increased appreciation for the skill set of technical services librarians.
Conclusions: Technical Services librarians should not hesitate to break out of the back room and participate in outreach activities.  Their skills can be of tremendous value to cross-departmental library teams and broader efforts.  This outreach benefits the librarians, the Library, and the user community.
Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, on May 15, 2005.</description>

<author>Lisa A. Palmer</author>


<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Library Technical Services</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Dr. Samuel B. Woodward: A 19th Century Pioneer in American Psychiatric Care</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/4</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:11 PST</pubDate>
<description>Objective: Showcase the life and work of Dr. Samuel B. Woodward, the medical superintendent of one of the first public hospitals for the mentally ill in the U.S., the Worcester State Hospital in Worcester, Mass.  Dr. Woodward overcame then-popular views of mental illness to champion compassionate, optimistic, and individualized treatment for patients. 
Methods: Dr. Samuel B. Woodward brought a significant paradigm shift to the dark world of mentally ill indigent citizens of Massachusetts in the early 19th century.  When Dr. Woodward became the first superintendent of Worcester State Hospital in 1833, mentally ill patients were viewed with suspicion and fear and were usually relegated to prisons and poorhouses. Woodward  rejected a supernatural explanation of mental illness that was very popular at that time.  He believed mental illness was a somatic disease, not unlike other diseases. His approach, called "moral therapy," consisted of kind, compassionate, individualized care that respected the patient as a human being.  Dr. Woodward was also instrumental in the burgeoning field of psychiatry.  He was a prolific writer and became the first president of the organization that would later become the American Psychiatric Association.
Presented at the Medical Library Association Annual Meeting, San Antonio, TX, on May 17, 2005.</description>

<author>Janet L. Dadoly</author>


<category>Worcester State Hospital</category>

<category>History, 19th Century</category>

<category>Mentally Ill Persons</category>

<category>Woodward, Samuel Bayard, 1787-1850</category>

<category>Hospitals, Psychiatric</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Challenges and Lessons Learned: Moving From Image Database to Institutional Repository</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lisa_palmer/2</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:14:10 PST</pubDate>
<description>Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to chronicle the Lamar Soutter Library's effort to build an educational image database, and how the project developed into an institutional repository.

Design/methodology/approach - The paper is divided into three phases and highlights the organizational, political, technological and resource issues that are unique to a specialized library with a medium-sized staff, lacking the resources of a traditional university campus. The case concludes with a list of barriers and facilitators to success and a summary of lessons learned.

Findings - The paper finds that a library with limited staff, funding, and systems development resources can initiate and support an institutional repository. Facilitators of success include clear lines of authority, a strong champion, and the appropriate technology for the project.

Originality/value - This paper serves as an example to libraries that are in the beginning phases of developing an institutional repository by discussing the barriers to and facilitators of success. </description>

<author>Mary E. Piorun</author>


<category>Libraries, Medical</category>

<category>Libraries, Digital</category>

<category>Databases</category>

<category>University of Massachusetts Medical School</category>

<category>Lamar Soutter Library</category>

<category>Institutional repositories</category>

<category>Library materials -- Digitization</category>

<category>Project management</category>

</item>



</channel>
</rss>
