Skip to main content
Presentation
Powerpoint- Setback Speech
Foundation For Economic Education (2017)
  • Michael Lewyn
Abstract
Setback regulations often require that all buildings be a certain amount of feet (usually about 25-50 feet from the street).  As a result of these zoning rules, all destinations outside the most urban areas have to place either parking or useless green spaces between the street and a store, office building or residence.
 
I argue that these regulations make walking more difficult, for four reasons.  First, pedestrians have to waste time walking through these empty spaces.  Second, walking through a sea of parking is simply no fun.  Pedestrians tend to enjoy shade and a sense of enclosure, so they tend to feel isolated when walking through these empty spaces. Third, setbacks mean that pedestrians have to dodge cars on their way to their destinations, which creates some risk of injury. First, setbacks artificially reduce density (and thus walkability) by reducing the amount of land available for housing and jobs. 
 
So why do cities still have these rules?  I found some arguments for them in Seattle’s comprehensive plan. First, the plan claims that setbacks "ensure access to light and air."  But all human beings breathe air no matter where buildings are placed, so "air" is irrelevant.  Access to "light" also exists no matter where buildings are placed (with the possible exception of very tall buildings  that might cast shadows- and generally, high rises tend to be downtown where there aren’t setback regulations anyhow). Second, the plan also claims that setbacks create a "sense of privacy."  This argument is so subjective that it is immune to verification. 
Keywords
  • setbacks,
  • zoning
Publication Date
June 15, 2017
Location
Atlanta, GA
Citation Information
Michael Lewyn. "Powerpoint- Setback Speech" Foundation For Economic Education (2017)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/lewyn/126/