<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lee Dyer</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer</link>
<description>Recent documents in Lee Dyer</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:28:14 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Achieving Marketplace Agility Through Human Resource Scalability</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/24</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/24</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:42 PST</pubDate>
<description>[Excerpt] Increasingly, firms find themselves, either by circumstances or choice, operating in highly turbulent business environments. For them, competitiveness is a constantly moving target. Many, it appears, are satisfied to enjoin the struggle with patched up business models and warmed over bureaucracies. But some, convinced that this is a losing proposition, are aggressively exploring and even experimenting with alternative frameworks and approaches. The monikers are many -- kinetic (Fradette and Michaud, 1998), dynamic (Peterson and Mannix, 2003), resilient (Hamel and Valikangas, 2003) and our favorite, agile (Shafer, Dyer, Kilty, Ericksen and Amos, 2001) -- but the aim is the same: to create organizations where change is the natural state of affairs. Clearly, this quest poses a number of major challenges for our field (Dyer and Shafer, 1999, 2003), one of which, optimizing human resource scalability, is the subject of this essay.</description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Articles</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Dynamic Organizations: Achieving Marketplace and Organizational Agility with People</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/23</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/23</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 13:07:37 PST</pubDate>
<description>Driven by dynamic competitive conditions, an increasing number of firms are experimenting with new, and what they hope will be, more dynamic organizational forms. This development has opened up exciting theoretical and empirical venues for students of leadership, business strategy, organizational theory, and the like. One domain that has yet to catch the wave, however, is strategic human resource management (SHRM). In an effort to catch up, we here draw on the dynamic organization (DO) and human resource strategy (HRS) literatures to delineate both a process for uncovering and the key features of a carefully crafted HRS for DOs. The logic is as follows. DOs compete through marketplace agility. Marketplace agility requires that employees at all levels engage in proactive, adaptive, and generative behaviors, bolstered by a supportive mindset. Under the right conditions, the essential mindset and behaviors, although highly dynamic, are fostered by a HRS centered on a relatively small number of dialectical, yet paradoxically stable, guiding principles and anchored in a supportive organizational infrastructure. This line of reasoning, however, rests on a rather modest empirical base and, thus, is offered less as a definitive statement than as a spur for much needed additional research.</description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Workplace 2000: A Delphi-Study</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/22</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/22</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:39:18 PST</pubDate>
<description>[Excerpt] Prognosticate and one thing is certain: you are likely to be wrong. Then why speculate about Workplace 20001 Because Boulding is right; as the future unfolds, surprise is preferable to astonishment. Informed speculation enhances anticipation
and understanding, the bases of informed decision-making. It produces a vision with which to agree or disagree, and the means to ascertain why. If the vision proves disagreeable,
there is a baseline from which to plot a preferred scenario. For in the end, Workplace 2000 will emerge not from prediction, but from choice.</description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>International Human Resource Studies: A Framework for Future Research</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/21</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/21</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:39:14 PST</pubDate>
<description>[Excerpt] The purpose of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework for research in a broadened and redefined field of international human resource studies. Interest in international aspects of human resource management (HRM) and policy has increased markedly in recent years'. This should not be surprising, given the growing importance of international economic activity in general, and, in particular, the increased mobility of technology, capital, and human resources across national boundaries. We are concerned that current research falling under this label is both too narrowly conceived and ignores important work from allied areas and disciplines. We also believe that the theoretical appeal and practical value of this work would be strengthened by includng contributions from a broader array of scholars, policy makers, and practitioners who share interests in employment and industrial relations issues. </description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>From Human Resource Strategy to Organizational Effectiveness: Lessons from Research on Organizational Agility</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/20</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/20</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:39:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>As a field of study and practice, strategic human resource management (SHRM) has come a long way in recent years. Still, at this point, the domain incorporating and connecting human resource strategy (HRS) and organizational effectiveness (OE) is essentially a theoretical and empirical &quot;black box&quot;. Here we use our ongoing research on people in agile organizations to peer into this &quot;black box&quot; and draw implications for future theorizing and research. Suggestions are made for reconceptualizing OE, incorporating organizational capability as a key concept, taking a broader than usual view of HRS, and systematically assessing vertical and horizontal alignment of HR activities. </description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Transforming Human Resource Organizations: A Field Study of Future Competency Requirements</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/19</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/19</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:39:05 PST</pubDate>
<description>As human resource organizations transform, staff competency requirements after significantly. The question is: to what? The present study attempts to answer this question using data gathered from knowledgeable observers within a single firm and employing a unique future-oriented, role focused methodology. The results suggest a competency model with three parts: a relatively small number of core competencies applicable across the full range of human resource roles studied, an even smaller number of leverage competencies applicable to half or more (but not all) of the roles, and a much larger number of competencies that are role specific. Leverage and roles specific competencies are combined into competency profiles for the various roles which, in turn, suggests a number of implications for the selection, development, and career progression of tomorrow's human resource managers and professionals. While this particular competency model and its implications may be situation specific, the methodology developed during the study can be readily replicated in an abbreviated form in virtually any organization.</description>

<author>Donna Blancero</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>People in the E-Business: New Challenges, New Solutions</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/18</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/18</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:39:01 PST</pubDate>
<description>[Excerpt] Human Resource Planning Society's (HRPS) annual State of the Art/Practice (SOTA/P) study has become an integral contributor to HRPS's mission of providing leading edge thinking to its members. Past efforts conducted in 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999 have focused on identifying the issues on the horizon that will have a significant impact on the field of Human Resources (HR).
	
This year, in a divergence from past practice, the SOTA/P effort aimed at developing a
deeper understanding of one critical issue having a profound impact on organizations and HR, the rise of e-business. The rise of e-business has been both rapid and dramatic. One
estimate puts the rate of adoption of the internet at 4,000 new users each hour (eMarketer, 1999) resulting in the expectation of 250 million people on line by the end of 2000, and 350 million by 2005 (Nua, 1999). E-commerce is expected to reach $1.3 trillion by 2003, and of that, 87 percent will go to the business to business (B2B) and 13 percent to the business to consumer (B2C) segments, respectively (Plumely, 2000).
</description>

<author>Patrick M. Wright</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Is There a New HRM? Contemporary Evidence and Future Directions</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/17</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/17</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:38:58 PST</pubDate>
<description>[Excerpt] Is there a new human resource management? Yo. That is, yes and no. A new perspective -- strategic human resource management -- emerged during the 80s to take its place alongside the more traditional operational and programmatic perspectives as a major influence on the field. This perspective has rapidly progressed in terms of theory and research (if not practice). But, it continues to take many shapes and forms, and even with its various permutations, is far from universally embraced by scholars or practitioners.What follows is a brief look at the strategic perspective of the field. It begins with a summary of some common themes. This is followed by an illustrative review of extant theory,which in particular distinguishes between the two dominant theoretical streams which have thus far emerged: (1) the multiple model theorists (MMTs) who are given to building typologies of
human resource strategies and describing or prescribing the conditions under which the various types work or should work best and (2) the dominant model theorists (DMTs) who are rather
less preoccupied with contingencies and rather more concerned with the details and promulgation of their preferred models or strategies within and across firms.Next comes a look at the extent to which these two views show up in actual practice.The evidence is sparse, but their diffusion appears to be rather limited thus far. This naturally gives rise to a discussion of the factors which seem to encourage and, especially, discourage diffusion. Particular attention is paid to the adoption of the so-called strategic business partner role by human resource executives, managers, and professionals, and to the adequacy of this role as a catalyst for the diffusion of the strategic perspective across the U. S. and Canadian economies. Finally, suggestions are made regarding future theoretical and empirical work which might help keep the strategic perspective moving ahead.</description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Dynamic Organizations: Achieving Marketplace And Organizational Agility With People</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/16</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/16</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:38:55 PST</pubDate>
<description>Driven by dynamic competitive conditions, an increasing number of firms are experimenting with new, and what they hope will be, more dynamic organizational forms. This development has opened up exciting theoretical and empirical venues for students of leadership, business strategy, organizational theory, and the like. One domain that has yet to catch the wave, however, is strategic human resource management (SHRM). In an effort to catch up, we here draw on the dynamic organization (DO) and human resource strategy (HRS) literatures to delineate both a process for uncovering and the key features of a carefully crafted HRS for DOs. The logic is as follows. DOs compete through marketplace agility. Marketplace agility requires that employees at all levels engage in proactive, adaptive, and generative behaviors, bolstered by a supportive mindset. Under the right conditions, the essential mindset and behaviors, although highly dynamic, are fostered by a HRS centered on a relatively small number of dialectical, yet paradoxically stable, guiding principles and anchored in a supportive organizational infrastructure. This line of reasoning, however, rests on a rather modest empirical base and, thus, is offered less as a definitive statement than as a spur for much needed additional research. </description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Articles</category>

<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Human Resources as a Source of Competitive Advantage</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/15</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lee_dyer/15</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 12:38:51 PST</pubDate>
<description>[Excerpt] For business it's a tough world that's getting tougher. The reasons are familiar enough: global competition, deregulation, finicky and tough customers, concerned and demanding stockholders, and a dizzying pace of constant change. Rare indeed is the company which has found a comfortable niche in this chaotic world. </description>

<author>Lee Dyer</author>


<category>Working Papers</category>

</item>



</channel>
</rss>
