<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Lawrence M. Solan</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan</link>
<description>Recent documents in Lawrence M. Solan</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 May 2009 08:27:37 PDT</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>The Uneasy Relationship Between Science and Law: An Essay and Introduction [Symposium: A Cross-Disciplinary Look at Scientific Truth]</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/70</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/70</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:51:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Margaret A. Berger</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>False Consensus Bias in Contract Interpretation</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/69</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/69</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:08:43 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Psychologists call the propensity to believe that one's views are the normal views even when they are not false consensus bias. In the interpretation of contracts, false consensus bias should be of special concern when a dispute arises over whether an event fits within contractual language. For psychologists have also found that consensus about category membership dissipates when people are presented with non-paradigmatic cases. We all agree that a table is a piece of furniture, but people hold different views about the status of, say, lamps.   In this article, we report experimental studies conducted with lay people and judges that present a problem for the law of contracts. When lay individuals are presented with scenarios relevant to the language of insurance contracts that have led to differences of opinion among the courts, they do not understand contractual language uniformly, and because they are subject to false consensus bias, believe that their interpretation is the normal interpretation, even when it is not. This is true whatever the scenario, whatever the interpretation, and whichever party will be assisted by one interpretation or the other. When judges were presented with the same scenarios, they also exhibited a form of false consensus bias. The solution lies in judges taking far more seriously the disagreement of other judges in determining whether language is clear, or whether it is subject to multiple interpretations. Otherwise, litigants may be subjected to a form of lottery in which they are subject to the particular idiosyncratic interpretation of the judge assigned to their case. Concern about the reasonable expectations of the parties should also be taken into account.</description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Fault Lies Not Only in Starr But in Law</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/68</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/68</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:19:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>A Cinderella Affidavit: Thriller and Biting Commentary on Legal System (reviewing Michael Frederickson, Cinderella Affidavit)</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/67</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/67</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:18:50 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Think It Through: a Constitutional Scholar Explains Why Congress Is Wise to Go Slow on Anti-Terror Laws That Would Erode Individual Rights</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/66</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/66</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:54:34 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Wrist Slaps are No Deterrent</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/65</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/65</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:52:42 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Presidents and Scandals: Bush and Uranium, Clinton and Sex, Reagan and Iran-contra: What Do They Have in Common?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/64</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/64</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:49:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Pointing Fingers</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/63</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/63</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:48:05 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Forum: Forensic Science, No Consensus</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/62</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/62</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:35:30 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Catch Phrase [Commentary]</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/61</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/lawrence_solan/61</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:34:07 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Lawrence M. Solan</author>


<category>Chronology</category>

</item>



</channel>
</rss>
