"Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund" by Kevin F. O'Neill

Article

Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund

University of Baltimore Law Review

Kevin F. O'Neill, Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University

Download

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

10-1-1976

Keywords

workers' compensation law,
evidence,
labor law,
employment law

Disciplines

Labor and Employment Law and
Law

Abstract

Discusses evidentiary requirements in Workers' Compensation cases and circuit court review of Workers' Compensation Commission decisions.

Citation Information

Kevin F. O'Neill. "Workmen's Compensation - Evidence - Opinion of Non-Treating Psychiatrist Based on Claimant's Statements Held Inadmissible - Candella v. Subsequent Injury Fund" University of Baltimore Law Review Vol. 6 Iss. 1 (1976) p. 165 - 180
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/kevin_oneill/36/