Criminal Law and Procedure

PDF

We Don’t Want to Hear It: The Moral and Psychological Legitimacy of Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2009)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” model of legal judging, which argues...
 

PDF

A Defense of Moral Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2008)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” approach to legal judging, which I...
 

PDF

Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (forthcoming) (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
 

PDF

The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)

Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...

 

PDF

The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
 

PDF

What's Wrong with Harmless Theories of Punishment (with John M. Darley), Chicago-Kent Law Review (2004)
This paper argues that both consequentialist and retributivist punishment philosophies rest on similar analyses of...
 

Economics

PDF

Law, Psychology, and Morality (with Janice Nadler), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2008)
In a democratic society, law is an important means to express, manipulate, and enforce moral...
 

PDF

The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)

Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...

 

PDF

What's Wrong with Harmless Theories of Punishment (with John M. Darley), Chicago-Kent Law Review (2004)
This paper argues that both consequentialist and retributivist punishment philosophies rest on similar analyses of...
 

Evidence

PDF

We Don’t Want to Hear It: The Moral and Psychological Legitimacy of Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2009)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” model of legal judging, which argues...
 

PDF

A Defense of Moral Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2008)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” approach to legal judging, which I...
 

PDF

Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (forthcoming) (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
 

PDF

The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
 

Legal Theory

PDF

Law, Psychology, and Morality (with Janice Nadler), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2008)
In a democratic society, law is an important means to express, manipulate, and enforce moral...
 

PDF

Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (forthcoming) (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
 

PDF

The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)

Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...

 

PDF

The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
 

PDF

What's Wrong with Harmless Theories of Punishment (with John M. Darley), Chicago-Kent Law Review (2004)
This paper argues that both consequentialist and retributivist punishment philosophies rest on similar analyses of...
 

Psychology

PDF

Law, Psychology, and Morality (with Janice Nadler), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2008)
In a democratic society, law is an important means to express, manipulate, and enforce moral...
 

PDF

Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (forthcoming) (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
 

PDF

The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)

Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...

 

PDF

The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
 

PDF

What's Wrong with Harmless Theories of Punishment (with John M. Darley), Chicago-Kent Law Review (2004)
This paper argues that both consequentialist and retributivist punishment philosophies rest on similar analyses of...
 

Psychology and Psychiatry

PDF

We Don’t Want to Hear It: The Moral and Psychological Legitimacy of Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2009)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” model of legal judging, which argues...
 

PDF

A Defense of Moral Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2008)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” approach to legal judging, which I...
 

Public Law and Legal Theory

PDF

We Don’t Want to Hear It: The Moral and Psychological Legitimacy of Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2009)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” model of legal judging, which argues...
 

PDF

A Defense of Moral Exclusion in the Law, ExpressO (2008)
This article challenges a fundamental tenet of the “narrative” approach to legal judging, which I...