Criminal Law and Procedure
We Don’t Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging, Illinois Law Review (2009)
The “narrative” model of legal judging argues that legal decision makers both do and should...
Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)
Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...
The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
What's Wrong with Harmless Theories of Punishment (with John M. Darley), Chicago-Kent Law Review (2004)
This paper argues that both consequentialist and retributivist punishment philosophies rest on similar analyses of...
Economics
Law, Psychology, and Morality (with Janice Nadler), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2008)
In a democratic society, law is an important means to express, manipulate, and enforce moral...
The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)
Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...
What's Wrong with Harmless Theories of Punishment (with John M. Darley), Chicago-Kent Law Review (2004)
This paper argues that both consequentialist and retributivist punishment philosophies rest on similar analyses of...
Evidence
We Don’t Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging, Illinois Law Review (2009)
The “narrative” model of legal judging argues that legal decision makers both do and should...
Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
Legal Theory
We Don’t Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging, Illinois Law Review (2009)
The “narrative” model of legal judging argues that legal decision makers both do and should...
Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
Law, Psychology, and Morality (with Janice Nadler), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2008)
In a democratic society, law is an important means to express, manipulate, and enforce moral...
The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)
Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...
The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
Psychology
We Don’t Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging, Illinois Law Review (2009)
The “narrative” model of legal judging argues that legal decision makers both do and should...
Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...
Law, Psychology, and Morality (with Janice Nadler), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (2008)
In a democratic society, law is an important means to express, manipulate, and enforce moral...
The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, Boston University Law Review (2007)
Why should people ever be satisfied when a third party punishes in their name, as...
The Fall of the Confession Era, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (2005)
This book review-essay of Solan & Tiersma’s SPEAKING OF CRIME argues that with the advent...
Psychology and Psychiatry
We Don’t Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging, Illinois Law Review (2009)
The “narrative” model of legal judging argues that legal decision makers both do and should...
Public Law and Legal Theory
We Don’t Want to Hear It: Psychology, Literature and the Narrative Model of Judging, Illinois Law Review (2009)
The “narrative” model of legal judging argues that legal decision makers both do and should...
Self-Incrimination Doctrine is Dead; Long Live Self-Incrimination Doctrine: Confessions, Scientific Evidence, and the Anxieties of the Liberal State, Cardozo Law Review (2008)
Confessions have historically been the most compelling evidence the state could offer at a criminal...