Keeping it "All in the Family:" Does Nepotism in the Hiring Process Really Benefit the Beneficiary?
Note: Link is to the article in a subscription database available to users affiliated with Butler University. Appropriate login information will be required for access. Users not affiliated with Butler University should contact their local librarian for assistance in locating a copy of this article.
The purpose of this research was to examine the consequences of being perceived as having benefited from a family connection during the hiring process. One hundred and ninety-seven upper-level undergraduate students reviewed materials describing three candidates for a managerial position. Selection method (merit vs. nepotism) and gender of the person who received the position were manipulated in the materials. Results revealed that not only was nepotism perceived as being less fair than merit-based hiring, but individuals believed to have benefited from a family connection during the hiring process were viewed less favorably than individuals believed to have been hired based on merit.
M. Y. Padgett and Kathryn A. Morris. "Keeping it "All in the Family:" Does Nepotism in the Hiring Process Really Benefit the Beneficiary?" Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 11 (2006): 34-45.