Silence: Insolubly Ambiguous and Deadly: The Constitutional, Evidentiary and Moral Reasons for Excluding ‘Lack of Remorse’ Testimony and Argument in Capital Sentencing Proceedings
Suggested Citation
Jules Epstein. "Silence: Insolubly Ambiguous and Deadly: The Constitutional, Evidentiary and Moral Reasons for Excluding ‘Lack of Remorse’ Testimony and Argument in Capital Sentencing Proceedings" Temple Political and Civil Rights Law Review 14 (2004): 45.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jules_epstein/30