<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Michael C Johanek</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek</link>
<description>Recent documents in Michael C Johanek</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 20:01:28 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Reinventing Leaders for a New Era in Education Management</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/12</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/12</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:35:17 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek et al.</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

<category>school reform</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>School Reform That Matters</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/11</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/11</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:07:46 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>A "loving critic" of the U.S., Dean Kishore Mahbubani at the National University of Singapore, suggests that "American society could ... fail if it does not force itself to conceive of failure." Our "first systemic failure," claims Mahbubani, is "groupthink." evident in our collective inability to challenge the "manifest nonsense" from financial sector officials years ago. Today, "the belief that American society allows every idea to be challenged has led Americans to assume that every idea is challenged. They have failed to notice when their minds have been enveloped in groupthink."[1]  Might this apply to our ideas about school reform? Have we slipped into groupthink, holding fast to our belief that X will lead to better outcomes for our kids, despite persistent evidence to the contrary?</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

<category>History</category>

<category>Community schools</category>

<category>school reform</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Enduring Appeal of Community Schools</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/10</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/10</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 07:59:36 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Lee Benson et al.</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

<category>History</category>

<category>Community schools</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>A Faithful Mirror: Reflections on the College Board and Education in America</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/9</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:18:17 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Leonard Covello and the Making of Benjamin Franklin High School - Education as It Citizenship Mattered</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/8</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:14:40 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek et al.</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

<category>History</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Accounting for Citizenship: Are our expectations for civic education too modest?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/7</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:06:17 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In an era of tests and standards, how do our schools score in preparing citizens? Are any superintendents worrying about their jobs because of low civic scores on state assessments?</p>
<p>There is no more central purpose to schools in a democracy than the preparation of citizens, yet you would hardly know it from how we hold these key public institutions accountable. Questions about the health of our civic life underlie many of today's central campaign issues, from taxes to foreign policy. What sort of democracy are we, and what do we expect every citizen to be able to do?</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek et al.</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Evolution of College Entrance Examinations</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/6</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:06:13 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Over the last 150 years, one of the hallmarks of American education has been the testing of increasingly large groups of people through processes of growing sophistication made possible by continuing advances in the technology of information processing. Much of this testing has been largely external to the instructional process, driven by the interests of policymakers and governments, especially vis-à-vis grades K-12, and has served various ends.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Donald M. Stewart et al.</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Teaching the College Introductory Survey in the High School: Reaching out to AP U.S. History Teachers</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/5</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:06:08 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The College Board's Advanced Placement (AP) program now serves as a strong vehicle for promoting high academic standards, with college-level work for high school students. The product of a unique collaboration between high school teachers and college faculty dating back to the 1950s, AP is the de facto standard for academic programs that help students make the transition from high school to college. The recognition of AP as a program of academic excellence has, in turn, fueled a rapid expansion in the number of students taking the examinations. Last year, approximately 250,000 students took the Advanced Placement United States History examination. With this growth comes the continued twin challenges of maintaining high standards that correspond with advances in each discipline, and expanding access to these rigorous courses in much more equitable ways.</p>
<p>In this article we provide a brief overview of college faculty's involvement in the school-college collaboration that is AP, including the College Board's expanded efforts to strengthen its support to AP teachers.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek et al.</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Race, Gender and Ethnicity in the United States History Survey: &lt;em&gt;Introduction&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/4</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:06:03 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>It is one of the great pleasures and challenges of the Advanced Placement Program that many of the central enduring dilemmas of a discipline insist upon resolution. The sort of matters that can provoke the wry smiles of seasoned colleagues across a faculty meeting require concrete resolution for the real-world operation of this large-scale liberal arts enterprise seeking to span the realms of school and college. These matters can not be for us, in that lamentable popular expression, "an academic question." Courses need to be taught, teachers supported, students challenged, work assessed. And what are these dilemmas? Our authors have set some of these on the table for us: What constitutes the survey, and what are its central goals? How do we "reconcile the tyranny of generalization with the anarchy of the particular" as Jonathan Chu so nicely puts it? How do we ensure that new research in women's history - or any other new threads of scholarship for that matter - gets integrated into college and AP high school courses, and avoids the "add women and stir" recipe approach Mary Frederickson so aptly captured? (I do note it is a cooking metaphor, but will leave it there). How do we get beyond the "basic mantra of patriarchal hegemony," as Mary argues, and destabilize the survey a bit, even perhaps transforming it by letting go of chronology some, by subverting the "tyranny of coverage," and by stopping cleaning up the dirty mess that is our wonderful human heritage, arriving someday, just maybe, beyond the "unsexed and neutered" stories, learning more richly about women and men? How do we move ethnicity and immigration beyond, as Diane Vecchio urges, their bounded period units and beyond their association with "problems"? And in all of this, how can we insure, as Uma Venkateswaran has illustrated, that the way we assess student achievement fairly reflects what we're after, and also helps us understand what in fact is happening in classrooms around the country, so that we can inform ourselves more accurately of the status of this noble craft? For the survey, and therefore for the AP United States history course, these questions get answered whether explicitly addressed or not. AP is a mirror, if you will, as faithful as our approaches allow, to the answers made by faculty on their own.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Review of Ellen Condliffe Lagemann, &lt;em&gt;An Elusive Science: The Troubling History of Education Research&lt;/em&gt;</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:06:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Brutish and bloody ethnic slaughter across the globe. Dangerous environmental degradation. Stifling cultural ennui with rampant turbo-consumerism. Menacing saber rattling from Gaza to the Taiwan Strait. Narrow problematics in education research.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Public Purposes of Public Education: The Evolution of Community-Centered Schooling at Benjamin Franklin High School, 1934-1944</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/2</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:05:55 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In 1934, Italian immigrant Leonard Covello and others set up Benjamin Franklin High School in East Harlem. Its purpose was to coordinate the educational influences emanating the neighborhood's many institutions, and to inform local citizen decision-making with intensive local social research. A leader in urban education, Benjamin Franklin High pioneered a distinctive community-centered schooling. Covello insisted that "education for social living" be based on solving real community problems in order to prepare students for leadership and civic participation. Problems ranging from poor housing to leisure opportunities to intergroup relations were channeled through Franklin's system of school-community committees.</p>
<p>This dissertation describes the evolution of the vision, one of active public purpose, that inspired Benjamin Franklin High in its early years. How did the ideas that guided such an unusual school mission evolve? How were they shaped and changed by their interaction with local events, national trends, demographics, personalities, and social conditions? Though an institutional history, this essay attempts to capture the interplay among a wide configuration of educating agents, in particular the "messy" dynamics of a public school's relationship to its community. Fundamental tensions regarding the nature of the public purposes of schooling, as well as whose purposes are pursued, underlie this intensely local struggle.</p>
<p>Chapter I describes the social, economic, and political context of East Harlem in the early 1930s, including the campaign to establish Benjamin Franklin. Chapter II sets out the broader conversation about community schooling in the early 1930s. Chapter III presents the life of Leonard Covello, examining the complex interplay of religious, intellectual, and personal experiences that influenced his vision of public. schooling for East Harlem. In Chapters IV and V, the challenges of promoting cultural democracy - through local research, storefront units, adult education, teacher training, curriculum and public rallies - flesh out the idea of community-centered schooling as it evolved in East Harlem.</p>
<p>Drawing upon varied traditions of community research, early urban sociology, social Christianity and settlement house traditions, Covello shaped a distinct vision of schooling's public role in the democratic development of a diverse people. Implications for current education policy are suggested.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek</author>


<category>Policy and Administration</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Enhanced Academic Connections -- Deweyan Waste, Ecological Pipelines, and Intellectual Vitality</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/johanek/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/johanek/1</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 15:03:01 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Michael C. Johanek et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
