Skip to main content
Article
The Dynamic Lives and Static Institutions of the "Two Armies:" Data from the 1999 Survey of Active Duty Personnel
Journal of Armed Forces and Society (2011)
  • Daniel Burland
  • Jennifer H. Lundquist, University of Massachusetts - Amherst
Abstract

The U.S. Army consists of two distinct functional components: soldiers serving in combat roles, on the one hand, and those who serve in support positions, on the other. Do these two functionally distinct segments differ culturally as well? Empirical researchers utilizing qualitative methods have supported a ‘‘Two Armies’’ concept. This article examines the phenomenon quantitatively by using a nationally representative sample of the active duty population. The authors find that there is a statistically significant difference between support and combat soldiers that holds even after taking into account differing demography. Interestingly, this is true mainly of White soldiers, and the authors find that it is driven by premilitary, civilian socialization. This dataset also clearly shows that, for most soldiers, the split between the two segments of the Army tends to diminish over time, with combat and support soldiers sharing more similar motivations with one another later in their terms of service.

Keywords
  • military,
  • two armies hypothesis,
  • institutional/occupational orientation,
  • U.S. Army,
  • segmented military,
  • socialization
Publication Date
2011
Citation Information
Daniel Burland and Jennifer H. Lundquist. "The Dynamic Lives and Static Institutions of the "Two Armies:" Data from the 1999 Survey of Active Duty Personnel" Journal of Armed Forces and Society (2011)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jennifer_lundquist/15/