![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/SA4N9t-326tHJoqrSMHL2L_vloI=/0x0:611x792/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/ad/b0/89/adb089ec-ebae-4833-8fb6-ba8debe5293f/thumbnail_2b6a927a-fb66-4d3a-92be-60d4770d1661.jpg)
Article
“Faith, Reason and History in Early Modern Catholic Biblical Interpretation: Fr. Richard Simon and St. Thomas More.”
New Blackfriars
(2015)
Abstract
This article contrasts St. Thomas More's theoretical work on the role of faith and history in biblical exegesis with that of Fr. Richard Simon. I argue that, although Simon's work appears to be a critique of his more skeptical contemporaries like Hobbes and Spinoza, in reality he is carrying their work forward. I argue that More's union of faith and reason, theology and history, is more promising than Simon's for Catholic theological biblical exegesis.
Keywords
- Richard Simon,
- St. Thomas More,
- History of Biblical Studies,
- Humanism,
- History of Biblical Interpretation,
- Reformation,
- Seventeenth Century
Publication Date
November, 2015
DOI
10.1111/nbfr.12127
Citation Information
Jeffrey Morrow. "“Faith, Reason and History in Early Modern Catholic Biblical Interpretation: Fr. Richard Simon and St. Thomas More.”" New Blackfriars Vol. 96 Iss. 1066 (2015) p. 658 - 673 ISSN: 0028-4289 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/jeffrey-morrow/31/