Skip to main content
Other
Critical Evaluation of the Use of Dogs in Biomedical Research and Testing in Europe
Companion Animals as Laboratory Research Subjects Collection
  • Nina Hasiwa, University of Konstanz
  • Jarrod Bailey, Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
  • Peter Clausing, Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International
  • Mardas Daneshian, University of Konstanz
  • Sándor Farkas, Gedeon Richter Ltd.
  • István Gyertyán, Gedeon Richter Ltd.
  • Robert Hubrecht, Universities Federation for Animal Welfare, UK
  • Werner Kobel, ToxAdvice GmbH
  • Goran Krummenacher, Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation
  • Marcel Leist, University of Konstanz
  • Hannes Lohi, University of Helsinki
  • Adám Miklósi, Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments
  • Frauke Ohl, University of Utrecht
  • Klaus Olejniczak, Regulatory Toxicology Consultant
  • Georg Schmitt, F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd
  • Patrick Sinnett-Smith, Pfizer Worldwide R&D
  • David Smith, European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations
  • Kristina Wagner, German Animal Welfare Federation
  • James D. Yager, Johns Hopkins University
  • Joanne Zurlo, Johns Hopkins University
  • Thomas Hartung, University of Konstanz
Document Type
Report
Publication Date
4-1-2011
Abstract

Dogs are sometimes referred to as “man’s best friend” and with the increase in urbanization and lifestyle changes, dogs are seen by their owners as family members. Society expresses specific concerns about the experimental use of dogs, as they are sometimes perceived to have a special status for humans. This may appear somewhat conflicting with the idea that the intrinsic value of all animals is the same, and that also several other animal species are used in biomedical research and toxicology. This aspect and many others are discussed in an introductory chapter dealing with ethical considerations on the use of dogs as laboratory animals. The report gives an overview on the use of dogs in biomedical research, safety assessment and the drug developmental process and reflects the discussion on the use of dogs as second (non-rodent)species in toxicity testing. Approximately 20,000 dogs are used in scientific procedures in Europe every year, and their distinct genetic, physiological and behavioral characteristics may support their use as models for e.g. behavioral analysis and genetic research. Advances in the 3Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of experiments using dogs) are described, potential opportunities are discussed and recommendations for further progress in this area are made.

Comments

A report of t4 – the transatlantic think tank for toxicology, a collaboration of the toxicolgically oriented chairs in Baltimore, Konstanz and Utrecht sponsored by the Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation.

This workshop was held in memory of Hildegard Doerenkamp (1920 – 2011), the philanthropic cofounder of the Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation.

Citation Information
Hasiwa, N., Bailey, J., Clausing, P., Daneshian, M., Eileraas, M., Farkas, S., ... & Leist, M. (2011). Critical evaluation of the use of dogs in biomedical research and testing in Europe. Alternatives to animal experimentation: ALTEX, 28(4), 326-340.