Interpersonal Deception: I. Deceivers’ Reactions to Receivers’ Suspicions and Probing.

Jamie Comstock, Butler University

Abstract

Investigates mutual influence in deception in a study on the effectiveness of probing as a detection strategy. Proposes that receivers communicate suspicion in probing questions, causing deceivers to alter their nonverbal presentations and appear more convincing; Background and theoretical development; Method; Results.

Note: Link is to the article in a subscription database available to users affiliated with Butler University. Appropriate login information will be required for access. Users not affiliated with Butler University should contact their local librarian for assistance in locating a copy of this article.