James T Struck Copyright (c) 2012 All rights reserved. http://works.bepress.com/james_struck Recent documents in James T Struck en-us Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:32:36 PST 3600 Archbishop John Carroll, Daniel Carroll and the 2nd Amendment-Right to bear arms could be related to holding up, talking to, giving birth to people like the Jesuits, Others Rather than Related to Gun Issues. Could Be used to support association rights with parents, friends, others http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/26 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/26 Sun, 12 Feb 2012 18:46:24 PST From Wikipedia.org article on Daniel Carroll, “Carroll was an active member of the Constitutional Convention. Like his good friend James Madison, Carroll was convinced that a strong central government was needed to regulate commerce among the states and with other nations.” “He was a prominent member of one of the United States' great colonial Catholic families, whose members included his younger brother Archbishop John Carroll, the first Catholic bishop in the United States and founder of Georgetown University;” from wikipedia.org article on Daniel Carroll. “Carroll spoke about 20 times during the debates at the Constitutional Convention and served on the Committee on Postponed Matters. Returning to Maryland after the convention, he campaigned for ratification of the Constitution, but was not a delegate to the state convention.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Carroll accessed 2/12/2012. Daniel Carroll’s younger brother John Carroll was a Jesuit and the leader of the Catholic Church in the US. The Jesuits were known as a semi-military organization or a company related to Jesus as Ignatius Loyola was a former soldier from Spain who trained in France. Bear has meanings such as give birth to, talk to, transmit, hold up, support and this other meaning of militia as a religious organization or organization of people with spiritual issues in mind could mean bear arms relates to transmit, supporting, holding up, giving birth to people rather than related to guns, arms, weapons, missiles. 2nd Amendment interpretation changes when we see John Carroll as the director of the Catholic Church in the US and his older brother’s connection with the writing of the US Constitution. This interpretation as “e. To take as a companion, take along with one; to carry as a consequence. Obs.f.to bear across : to support (things) going across.c.to bear (any one) company (fellowship obs.) , to bear a hand : to bring, give, lend it. †to bear one a blow : to give or ‘fetch’ him a blow. Obs.bear, v.1 Second edition, 1989; online version December 2011. ; accessed 12 February 2012. Earlier version first published in New English Dictionary, 1887” Can be used to support association rights with others when jurisdictions deny association such as when Cook County and Illinois deny phone, visitation, fresh air away from smoking, consent, home, religious services, museums, parks, zoos, reunions to people and families under guardianship.

]]> James T. Struck How Affirmative Action Could Be used to Make a Co-President And Protect Civil Rights http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/25 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/25 Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:08:13 PST How Affirmative Action Could Be used to Make a Co-President And Protect Civil Rights The presidency can be seen as a loaf of bread with many slices-one presidency/president but many co presidents. Affirmative action law has been federal law since the 1960’s. I have Lithuanian, German, Luxembourg, French, Belgium, Russian ancestry, some hernia/blistering, and affirmative action concepts could mean those ancestries, disability should be favored. My debate partners were female, Asian American, and some could once be called Jewish or Ukrainian American too, so these groups could be favored by affirmative action law. My partners and I won the National Debate Tournament, Harvard Tournament, 1st Seed St. Mark's Texas, NU, Emory Debate Tournament, California Swing, Redlands Debate Tournament, Hoover Debate Tournament, ISU Debate Tournament, New Trier, GBS, 2nd place JV State, 3rd place Emory Debate Tournament, 2nd place Vermont Debate Tournament etc. My partners and I had electors in many states voting for us by ballot following the 12th amendment. Using the U.S. Constitution, my partners and I could be named co presidents of the United States. (The names of my debate partners from 1982-1986 were Michael Tso, Mitchell Zaveduck, Scott Lew, Jay Saltzman, Robert Unikel, Brian Kramer, and John Loevy, and Rebecca from Louisiana at Vermont Debate Institute) Affirmative action to declare co-presidents can be used to protect civil rights and liberties-are we denying some right/liberty to this person co-president that we grant to a president? If we are denying any right that we grant to a president (with the exception of bombing innocent people which we should deny as a right), then that right should be granted Some of the affirmative action laws that could be used to support a co presidency by several discriminated against groups are here from Wikipedia.org’s discussion of Affirmative Action in the U.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action_in_the_United_States accessed 1/5/2011.1866 - The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution mandates that no state "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."1954- Brown v. Board of Education. The Supreme Court ruled that separate educational facilities were "inherently unequal" and violated the Fourteenth Amendment. The next year the Court ordered segregated districts to integrate with "all deliberate speed." 1961 - Executive Order No. 10925,[14] issued by President Kennedy Established the concept of affirmative action by mandating that projects financed with federal funds "take affirmative action" to ensure that hiring and employment practices are free of racial bias. 1964 - Section 717 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 1965 - U.S. Executive Order 11246 and Executive Order 11375 The order, as amended, aims "to correct the effects of past and present discrimination". The order requires that contractors take affirmative action to ensure that "protected class, underutilized applicants" are employed when available, and that employees are treated without negative discriminatory regard to their protected-class status. 1973 - Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Section 717 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 require all United States Federal Agencies to implement affirmative employment opportunity programs for all federal employees.

]]> James T. Struck co-president, presidency, presidencies, affirmative action, laws, disability How Debate Tournaments Age Discrimination Law Can Be Used to Claim Presidency http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/24 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/24 Wed, 04 Jan 2012 12:53:01 PST The Age Discrimination Act and Age Discrimination in Employment Act make illegal discrimination related to age. My partners and I won debate tournaments or top seed in Hoover, Iowa, Nationals in Oklahoma that year 1986, Harvard, Redlands, California, Vermont/St. Mark's Texas /Emory Georgia /Northwestern (top seed most wins most pts in preliminary rounds), ISU, GBS, New Trier, California Swing, and other tournaments. Since I won debate tournaments when I was 14-18, these policy debate tournaments could be used to argue that I should be declared co-president as discrimination based on age is illegal. Just as one loaf of bread has many slices, a president could be seen as many persons. Recall that the US Constitution DOES NOT specify what electors are, how they are selected, and Bush v. Gore 5-4 did show that strange decisions are made. Any state Supreme Court in those states or the US Supreme Court could say that there is a question if there is unlawful age discrimination occurring as youthful wins, electors are denied significance when older, youthful electors, votes are discriminated against when older? Recall too that the Presidents' job in the oath is to protect and defend the US Constitution; one is supposed to talk about Constitutional questions/queries. When one wins many votes of judges, electors when young, these votes could be used to claim a presidency when older. A National Debate Championship, which my team GBN won in 1986, would give someone a claim on all delegates or even 270 electors. I could make a claim on 156 of the delegates with my debate tournament record at other tournaments. Recall anyone can run, so presidential candidates should not be denied visits, phone, reimbursement of bills with parents following Bell v. Milwaukee 1984 and other association rights precedents like NAACP giving the right to assemble. Jane Frances Back Struck should certainly not be given shots without consent for saying “Heaven, princess, leave me alone, shit, I am from France, birds of the air” protected by 1st Amendment. Jane Frances should be restored for her work as secretary, typist, model, poet, piano player, mother of 3, seamstress, driver, chauffeur, beauty contestant, homemaker, grad. Delegates from States where I won debate Tournaments or was Top seed(Most wins Best Pts Preliminary Rounds) California won California Swing (best Record LMU/Redlands) and Redlands 55 Illinois won ISU, New Trier, GBS, GBN other tournaments 20 Texas top seed St. Mark’s, Top seed is most wins, pts after preliminary rounds 38 Massachusetts won Harvard Debate Tournament 11 Vermont 2nd Vermont, top seed 3 Iowa won Hoover Debate Tournament 6 Georgia top seed Emory, dropped Semifinals 16 Nationals Partner and I Dropped Semifinals, Team won 7 to all Total delegates where National Debate Championship can mean all delegates as elector is not defined and I am now over 35 156 total with nationals claiming even 270

]]> James T. Struck Presidency, elections, electors, delegates, debate, age discrimination Illinois Judges, Guardians Not Rockefeller, Carnegie as Factors in Holocaust, Elder Disability Abuse http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/23 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/23 Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:38:41 PST From Judge Harry Olson Chief Justice of Municipal Court of Chicago "Indeed, if society can prevent degenerate stocks from multiplying, it is its supreme duty to do so," (1922, Eugenical Sterilization in The United States, Psychopathic Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago) Today, Judges Maureen E. Connors, Patrick J. Quinn, John Fleming, Federal Judges Der Yeghiayan, Suzanne Collins, Rebecca Pallmeyer, Wood, Posner, Cook County Guardians Nathan Goldenson, Dan Belko, Sadeta Kalamperovic continue to abuse people by denying phone, visitation, fresh air away from smoking, consent, chemicals used, coming home, rights to decide, resources, mail, medical records, religious services, museums, parks, zoos, reunions, and other rights. Sheriffs Blanco, Jevko, McGowan twist arms of people who request rights. Books like War Against the Weak by Edwin Black discuss how Rockefeller and Carnegie played some role in funding eugenics, but part of their activity was probably trying to bow or appeal to the actions of abusive state judges like Harry Olson and judges involved in resource appropriation like Henry Horner and others. In fact, Illinois judges engage in the same resource appropriation and abuse that they engaged in in the 1920's taking resources from disabled people and abusing them! James T. STruck BA,BS,AA, MLIS

]]> James T. Struck My Contirbution to 2 Nobel Prizes http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/22 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/22 Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:50:01 PST How Several People Contribute To Nobel Prizes Who Go Unmentioned My contribution to Nobel Prize in 2009 This email was sent 3/17/09 to comment@whitehouse.gov and others. President Barack Obama received the Nobel Prize in Peace in 2009 related to the letter. “According to a story on yahoo.com, the START 1 treaty will end soon. Russia in response is discussing rearmament of nuclear weapons. If nuclear materials are in warheads, people at a distance can be easily hurt by the missiles. If materials are outside a warhead, terrorism might occur with the materials. Discussing these issues at a START or SALT like treaty conference might be helpful to keep peace with regard to Russia and the US. Some of us grew up with movies about a Red Dawn or nuclear missile uses. Limiting the use of those weapons might be an interesting issue for President Obama and Biden to talk to Russian leadership about.” My contribution to Nobel Prizes in 2011. The Nobel Prize to 3 women in 2011 was associated with this email from 3/16/2006 Dear Nobel Institute and Award Committees for Medicine and Physics and other Committees, I wanted to express my distress over your not awarding the Nobel Prize to Dr. Jocelyn Bell Burnell and Rosalind Franklin. Even though Dr. Burnell at that point was not a professor and Ms. Franklin was only one of three people in Dr. Watson and Dr. Crick's laboratory, it is an insult to people who contribute discoveries to different fields for the award to not be given to Dr. Jocelyn Bell and Ms. Rosalind Franklin. Your institutes and academies should be ashamed of yourself. It is appalling that Dr. Bell and Ms. Franklin's contributions were not recognized while other people's contributions were. I admit I have an interest in this topic as I am someone who contributes to many fields without getting credit sometimes. I am just trying to show you that I am sort of like Dr. Bell and Ms. Franklin in being a non-professor contributor to many fields. How would you feel if your work was not recognized because you were not a professor or were a woman or a discriminated against person or member of a discriminated against group or race or ethnicity? The institutes and academies need to include all appropriate contributors without regard to whether or not the person has a PHD or is a professor. Some people are genuine victims of intense discrimination. Some people do not become professors because of family and community responsibilities. A final Note about Finality Why are we putting people in ground so quickly? Why should people not have several days of waking at different places?

]]> James T. Struck Friendship Spiritual Economics-Economic Simplicity Indicator-Economics not just in black box but interpretation also not in black box http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/21 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/21 Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:31:44 PDT The Soviet Union associated through economic assistance with Latin America in the 1980's, and some studies say around 1 million died related to that friendship. Friendship then can have costs looking at history. Some dictionaries define economics as the study of income, expenditures, and material needs of people, but spiritual issues also have costs, income, needs associated with them. Today's 10/10/2011 Nobel Prize in economics is a good choice, but Sims and Sargent's interest ideas ALSO do not exist in a black box and always are altered given circumstances. The Old Testament book Micah asks us to walk humbly, the New Testament discusses "greatest of these is love of God and love of neighbor." Ideas like "He who saves one life saves the whole world in time" from the Yad Vashem memorial and Jewish history have economic effects;people try to save lives as a result in some cases. Religious guidance can be associated with the following of the advice like people tried to imitate diversified portfolios and investment strategies. If we repeatedly tell people to walk humbly, economic effects are costs for blisters, foot pain, inflammation, exercise and ankle pain. Names have economic impacts too. Cassius Clay changes his name in 1964 to Muhammad Ali and some boxing persons and Martin Luther King question the name change with increased support for Islam associated with Ali's name change as we see an Islamic name more. Cassius Clay was 100-5 as an amateur and was not defeated with the name Cassius Clay. LaSalle Bank is taken over by Bank of America, Bank One by Chase, and money is spent changing the bank name. We can discuss economic, income, expenditure, material need effects of any event or phenomena. "Economic narrative" is an economic method I developed or named in 2009 where one discusses an event with economic terms like income or cost without extensive math or statistics. A few years ago in 2009, I described the use of the "Economic simplicity indicator" where a person subjectively describes if an economic phenomenon is complicated or simple. One can say "printing money is a simple solution to economic problems," while others can see the solution as "complicated with regard to the effect on interest rates and inflation." On Yom Kippur today, I should make clear that economic conspiracies have played a role in loss of life. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, according to much scholarship see for example wikipedia.org articles on the document as forgery and plagiarism, was a conspiracy to blame Jewish persons for the takeover of Russia written by persons associated with Russian secret police. Conspiracies can be seen as simple economic phenomena-blame some party for economic loss or benefit, and complicated phenomena, effects of a conspiracy are unclear. The economic simplicity indicator's value lies in making completely clear that interpretations of economic phenomenon are subjective and arbitrary at times. Not only are economic actions not taken in black boxes as Sims and Sargent were recognized for today, but the interpretation of those phenomena is opinionated, arbitrary and subjective too.

]]> James T. Struck arbitrary, black Box, Sims and Sargent Nobel, Economic Simplicity Indicator, Friendship, Spiritual Economics Advocacy for rights of disabled and different deserves the Nobel Prize as much as many other issues http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/20 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/20 Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:34:07 PDT From Nobel Prize in Peace site "The said interest shall be divided into five equal parts, which shall be apportioned as follows: /- - -/ one part to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." Illinois, Cook County, and many nations, states take away the rights to decide and resources of people with disability, difference, ill, sick, and others. Illinois and Cook County courts, some health care providers and guardians deny restoration, dental services, doctors of choice, phone, visitation, fresh air away from smoking, consent, medical records, fresh air, parks, museums, zoos, reunions, home, family funerals, practicing marriage, mail, floss, toothpaste, stamps, envelopes, belongings, rights to decide, reimbursement of care giving bills, resources, houses of worship, Christmas, Chanukah, holidays, books to different/disabled persons immorally much like slavery. Cook County sheriff staff twist arms, push people away when requesting fresh air away from smoking and other rights. Some shots/medication without consent damage ability to move, walk and talk, which really is abuse of a person's civil liberties, health and rights. Fraternity among nations would be promoted if states did not take away the rights of people who were different/disabled/"incompetent." Standing armies would be reduced, if people were allowed to sit when they wanted to and walk away from war when they wanted to walk away. Eugene V. Debs really did lose his freedom for similar concern. Peace congresses are promoted and held when one tells others that states should not immorally be depriving disabled and different people of rights and resources like slavery. Someone you know or from your region currently may be deprived of their rights and resources under a slavery like guardianship, health care system. Advocacy for rights of disabled and different deserves the Nobel Prize as much as many other issues. We should grant rights to decide to people who were once seen as incompetent related to their disabilities and differences except in cases where a person is going to severely harm themselves or others.

]]> James T. Struck Incompetent, Disability, Civil Liberties, Health Care, Guardianship, Nobel Prize, Civil Rights, Rights to Decide, Resources, Standing Armies, Peace Congresses by Articles Suicide as Homicide-Talking About Nuclear Testing Rather than Yousef Response http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/19 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/19 Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:53:47 PDT Understanding Suicide as Homicide to avoid Socrates, Jesus, Romantic images, Hiroshima could have been litigated TO: 59 More59 recipientsCC: 25 recipientsYou 25 More Hide Details FROM:James Struck TO:DPH.ccr@illinois.gov falr@unc.edu releases@aba.net zmag@zmag.org andy.dunn@zmag.org m-callahan@uchicago.edu lawreview@georgetown.edu lawreview@fordham.edu mathewson@isba.org loevylaw@loevy.com elderlaw@law.uiuc.edu chomsky@mit.edu supplierregistration@bankofamerica.com jadaletters@jada.org letters@jama.org letters@astronomy.com hrjournal@uchicago.edu editors@skyandtelescope.com letters@chicagoreader.com mspencer@web.net NULR.EAE@gmail.com illinoisissues@uis.edu newseditor@chroncle.com ideas@boeing.com xxp69@xinhuanet.com foundation@jfklfoundation.org letters@chicagomag.com phoenix@luc.edu niaidnews@niaid.nih.gov fiction@newyorker.com forum@dailynorthwestern.com jsedit@journalsentinel.com usda_hotline@oig.usda.gov mkreiter@upi.com governor@illinois.gov freshoffthepress@gmail.com wernick@northbrook.il.us fencepost@dailyherald.com letters@suntimes.com ctc-tribletter@tribune.com worldview@chicagopublicradio.org help@senate.gov jwisser@pioneerlocal.com uchicago-magazine@uchicago.edu tnm@baalunarsection.org.uk sboint0362@msn.com viewpoints@chicagomaroon.com adam@goodmanlawoffice.com comments@nobelprize.org webmaster@lungusa.org enable@un.org americanlibraries@ala.org letters@time.com letters@newsweek.com spacelaw@olemiss.edu michael.timmons@xprize.org BeaconViewpoint@scn1.com tips@nbcchicago.com editorial@catholicnewworld.com 56 More...CC:herman.145@osu.edu muse@press.jhu.edu gtaylor@pioneerlocal.com articleproposals@rd.com editors@thehumanist.org alumni@neiu.edu psq@tamu.edu lrarticles@law.uchicago.edu malberts@pioneerlocal.com enquiries@historytoday.com usptoinfo@uspto.gov editor@lbpc.com tips@fbi.gov 848@chicagopublicradio.org admin@playboy.com dynamdrew@aol.com techtransfer@nasa.gov public-inquiries@nasa.gov letters@nytimes.com jnes@uchicago.edu ebert@suntimes.com letters@americamagazine.org info@evanston150.org oped@washpost.com letters@life.com 20 More...Message flagged Thursday, September 15, 2011 7:49 PMMessage body Understanding Suicide as Homicide to avoid Socrates, Jesus, Romantic images From wikipedia.org's article on suicide "A painting of the English romantic poet Thomas Chatterton, believed to have killed himself with arsenic in 1770." The 9/11 attacks show that suicides are associated with large number of deaths. If suicides were described as homicide, one would understand self killing as harming an other or another person with regard to other people and understand one self as homo sapiens, human or person. One of the reasons suicide is important to study is someone could use suicide to harm a large number of people using nuclear weapons as many countries have such weapons-US, UK, USSR, Pakistan, Israel, India, France, South Africa, China. Understanding suicide as homicide, self killing, or self murder may decrease the risk of people being harmed with suicides associated with somewhat romantic images like Socrates, Seneca or Jesus. Talking about Nuclear Testing Normal, Could be Litigated, Talked About Rather than Yousef Approach Ramzi Yousef is said to have been concerned about Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but litigation about the issue such as Pakistan's proximity to Japanese radioactive wastes or debris may have been a better way to resolve his concerns. See wikipedia.org's discussion of Yousef's motives- "Ramzi Yousef sent a letter to the New York Times after bombing the WTC which spelled out the motive: "We declare our responsibility for the explosion on the mentioned building. This action was done in response for the American political, economical, and military support to Israel, the state of terrorism, and to the rest of the dictator countries in the region." He later stated that he had hoped to kill 250,000 Americans to show them the exact pain they had caused to the Japanese in the Atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.[13]" from wikipedia.org accessed on 9/15/2011 There is some chance that nuclear debris really did have some effect on Yousef as nuclear testing was still going on in South Asia. "In 1963, all nuclear and many non-nuclear states signed the Limited Test Ban Treaty, pledging to refrain from testing nuclear weapons in the atmosphere, underwater, or in outer space. The treaty permitted underground nuclear testing. France continued atmospheric testing until 1974, China continued up until 1980. Underground tests in the United States continued until 1992 (its last nuclear testing), the Soviet Union in 1990, the United Kingdom in 1991, and both China and France in 1996. After signing the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996 (which has as of 2011 not yet entered into force), all of these states have pledged to discontinue all nuclear testing. Non-signatories India and Pakistan last tested nuclear weapons in 1998." Nuclear weapons testing article in wikipedia.org accessed on 9/15/2011 Nuclear weapons debris may have sadly affected all of our health, and talking about that issue seems healthy and normal! The increase in cancer rates we saw worldwide really may have been due to nuclear testing and NOT smoking rates. James T. Struck BA,BS, AA, MLIS

]]> James T. Struck nuclear testing, suicide, homocide, litigation, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Yousef Critiquing Critical Legal Theory and Legal Education http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/18 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/18 Sun, 17 Jul 2011 18:55:45 PDT Critical Legal Theory arose in the US and is described as "The law exists to support the interests of the party or class that forms it and is merely a collection of beliefs and prejudices that legitimize the injustices of society" from Legal Information Institute accessed 7/17/2011. Critical Legal Theory simplifies law too much. Law actually tries to protect property, ideas, persons, things, other characteristics and does other things as well. Critical Legal Theory can explain some persecution of persons; in an effort not to protect the interests of a party or class, a party or class is persecuted or prosecuted.

Lawmakers, judges, lawyers sometimes derive money from revenues, taxes, income sometimes associated with harmful issues like taxes on harmful things and money associated with deaths, so the legal system is not trying to legitimize injustice. Laws are always formed associated with revenue from taxes on issues like income, water, alcohol, tobacco, weapons, sales, corporations, etc., so the laws are not supporting the interests of a party or class but rather have a relationship with revenues and taxes from many places including taxation of good, helpful, harmful issues and income. Because the lawmakers are taxed, their interest alone is not being protected, their class is not being protected. U.S. First Amendment concepts allow discussion of lawmakers receiving revenue from many sources including taxation of helpful and harmful things; lawmaking is more than party or class protection.

Law school graduates attend somewhere between 240-600 hours of classes, while prisoners in prison libraries or persons in libraries sometimes learn the law better. This concern is that lawyers, judges, and legal scholars should have more respect for the liberties and rights of those who appear before them as lawyers knowledge of law is not tremendously different in some cases than non-lawyer knowledge of laws.

Laws do not protect lawyers or one class, but apply to lawyers and those classes and parties as well. Critical legal theory could have the sad effect of making people persecute, prosecute classes, parties, wealth as a way to respond to Critical Legal Theories' claim that a party is being supported. Guardianship for example takes away rights and resources of persons with disabilities in some states, and Critical Legal Theory would support those actions possibly as a way to not support the interests of a class. Law actually protects persons, ideas, property, and has other functions in some locales not party interests, so the person with a disability or difference has rights or should have rights no matter what party or class is in power.

Aside from FDR and potentially anyone else, persons with disability are not in power, but the Americans With Disabilities Act and UN Convention on Persons with Disability protect the interests of persons with disability. Persons with disabilities' interest are not being protected in laws like some guardianship law that take away persons with disabilities rights. Critical Legal Theory is problematic and too simplistic, and Legal Education may be overvalued. Three years of training should not give rise to complete control over persons.

Critical Legal Theory may be one cause of some prosecution of persons in the United States and elswhere.In an effort not to protect a class or party, people who committed no great injustice are prosecuted. An "Astronomy Party" could be established focusing on travelling to other astronomical worlds, but the party would still be bound by old legal concepts and laws not just travel to the edges of the Universe. A "Leave Me Alone" party could want to focus on Justice Brandeis or some anarchists' concern with being left alone, but the parties' laws would not reflect that parties' interests alone. The "Baby in the White House Party" could want a first baby to be born in the White House in 130 years, but it would approve laws other than that interest. A "Restoring Party" would want people to be restored under guardianships or with convictions to voting rights, but the party would approve and pass hundreds of unrelated measures, laws. A "Congressional Earth" Party might actually vote for laws in the interest of a president, so that Congress alone was not blamed. The days when the Whigs, Know Nothings, Libertarians, Greens, Republicans, Democrats, Socialists, Anarchists, Communists are all the parties the US has had show that more diverse interests have been represented in our laws.

]]> James T. Struck Legal Theory Constitutional and Legal Phrases-How misuse of phrases leads to gun ownership, many presidents and enslavement of persons with disability http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/17 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/17 Thu, 05 May 2011 10:20:21 PDT Phrases in the Constitution can be used to declare difficult or problematic constitutional rights, and phrases are already used in problematic ways already. Take a look at the 12th Amendment "The Electors shall meet in their respective states, and vote by ballot," and consider how the 2nd amendment does not always get interpreted in light of the right to bear arms in a militia. Phrases are considered separately in the 2nd amendment-"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." If we allow people to bear arms outside militia, then we can take phrases like "electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot" to use ballots and debate judges or other judges to declare a co-president or co-presidents. Just as the 2nd amendment probably really was about arms in militias, the 12th amendment may contain a phrase about electors voting in ballots but the phrase should probably not be construed to name a president based on ballots of some form. Just as Cook County Guardian and Illinois courts enslave people with disabilities by taking away their rights and resources and denying basic civil liberties such as fresh air, phone, visitation, consent, chemicals used, coming home, religious services, there are problems with parts and phrases of the Constitution being used to take power over the United States. Cook County and Illinois misuse phrases in the Illinois Probate Law to enslave people with disabilities, but the ADA makes such discrimination illegal and unlawful. My partners and I won the National Debate Tournament, Harvard Tournament, 1st Seed St. Mark's Texas Debate Tournament, California Swing, Redlands Debate Tournament, Hoover Debate Tournament, ISU Debate Tournament, New Trier, GBS, 2nd place JV State, 3rd place Emory Debate Tournament, 2nd place Vermont Debate Tournament etc.. My partners and I had electors in many states voting for us by ballot. Using the U.S. Constitution, my partners and I could be named co presidents of the United States. Many words in the Constitution like "abridging the freedom of speech" are considered as separate phrases and not together with "not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." (The names of my debate partners from 1982-1986 were Michael Tso, Mitchell Zaveduck, Scott Lew, Jay Saltzman, Robert Unikel, Brian Kramer, and John Loevy, and Rebecca from Louisiana at Vermont Debate Institute) Using this phrase interpretation of the Constitution would give us the first woman president for example, but the interpretation of the 12th amendment is JUST as controversial as the current interpretation of the 2nd Amendment!!!

]]> James T. Struck Constitution, Phrases, Slavery, 2nd, 12th amendment, electors, ballots “The world must know what happened, and never forget,” Dwight David Eisenhower, Control of Masturbation, Missiles, Weapons, and the Holocaust-How Control of Difference in One Region Can Affect the Whole World http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/16 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/16 Sat, 30 Apr 2011 19:51:30 PDT The world must know what happened here and never forget was Eisenhower's gift to us on seeing the Nazi death camps. Such a policy of telling the world about something can be wonderful to let us understand the world better and horrible in bringing more parties into an action without need. Still, National Socialists stated that they imitated US disability and prison experimentation in Illinois. Telling the whole world about the Holocaust includes telling the whole world about US disability discrimination. Control of masturbation led to sterilization policies throughout the US and expanded into control of difference within National Socialist Germany as well. Small control actions in one state can be associated with genocide in another state. Complete control over persons under guardianships continues and should stop as slavery and morality concepts are being violated. Sterilizations to control masturbation were a type of control over persons which had disastrous effects. Eisenhower was in Kansas at the beginning of these sterilizations in 1894 and there at the end of the European Holocaust with his world must know comment.

]]> James T. Struck Genocide, Nuremberg War crimes trials,Slavery, Masturbation, missiles, holocaust, Eisenhower, World Must Know Responding to Nursing Home Abuse-Case Study of Illinois Department Of Public Health, Department of Professional Regulation. US Human Rights Record Worse than China Record http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/15 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/15 Sat, 06 Nov 2010 18:17:55 PDT Illinois takes away the right to decide and resources of people with disabilities under guardianship. Other nations and states also have guardianship with over 1.6 million people under guardianship, and 1.6 million in nursing homes. Some Illinois nursing homes deny liberties such as phone use, visitation, coming home, fresh air away from second hand smoking, consent, chemicals used, dental services, religious services, knowing where family is, museums, zoos, parks, reunions. This article addresses the regulatory response. When seeking the assistance of the Illinois Department of Public Health, Illinois Human Rights Department, and Illinois Department of Professional Regulation, requests for phone use, visitation, coming home, fresh air away from second hand smoking are still denied with decisions like "we do not have jurisdiction," "We already did a survey" "We will fight you tooth and nail" from Department of Professional Regulation staff member (when I requested fresh air away from second hand smoking)" "request denied."

]]> James T. Struck regulation, Public Health, Professional Regulation, China, Human Rights Record, Deparment of Human Rights, Nursing home Abuse, response, Surveys Guardianship as Genocide and Slavery and How Freedom of Information Can Let Others Know if Persons Are Losing Rights in Certain States http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/14 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/14 Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:15:40 PDT Guardianship May Be Like Slavery or Genocide as Guardians are Given Rights to Decide For Persons in Certain States or Nations and the Persons are Denied Rights to decide. Freedom of Information Act Programs Allow Other Nations or States to Know If Their Citizens or Persons of Their Ancestry are Being Held Without Rights Under Guardianship. Some Nations or States Have FOIA Programs While Others Probably Do Not Have Such Right to request records.

]]> James T. Struck Slavery, Guardianship, Genocide, Freedom of information, loss of rights, rights to decide, FOIA, nations, states Freedom of Information Act Requests Provide Some Possibility for Nations To Determine if Persons of Ancestries Have Lost All Rights in States Under Guardianship Somewhat Like Genocide or Slavery http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/13 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/13 Thu, 23 Sep 2010 21:11:56 PDT Guardianship May Be Like Slavery or Genocide in some states or nations as Guardians are Given Rights to Decide For Persons in Certain States or Nations and the Persons under guardianship are Denied Rights to decide. Freedom of Information Act Programs Allow Other Nations or States to Know If Their Citizens or Persons of Their Ancestry are Being Held Without Rights Under Guardianship. Some Nations or States Have FOIA Programs While Others Probably Do Not Have Such Right to request records.

]]> James T. Struck Information, Genocide, Slavery, Rights, Foreign laws, Guardianship law, guardians genocide, slavery, freedom of information act, FOIA, foreign law, guardianship, guardians, travel, loss of rights, right to decide Illinois Probate Law and Guardians Could Be Violating Convention On Genocide http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/12 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/12 Mon, 31 May 2010 20:16:38 PDT Illinois could be violating Genocide Conventions by taking away rights of disabled and different. Illinois Guardians, some health care institutions or Cook County Guardian may take away your rights and resources when you come to Illinois or other places, so some warning about loss of rights/resources may be helpful. Illinois advertises that it has the largest state guardianship system in the US on their guardianship and advocacy site (2009 information). See the "Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide." “Article 2 In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: " This article examines whether or not probate systems and guardianships taking away the rights to decide and resources of people with disabilities or differences could be genocide or legal genocide. Argument is made that taking away rights and resources amounts to destruction of an aspect of what a person is as rights are lost, and actions denying fresh air away from second hand smoking, consent and association rights amount to further destruction of a group of persons, those with differences or disabilities.

]]> James T. Struck Genocide, International Law, Convention on Genocide, Probate law, Guardianship, Civil Rights Multiple Office Holders To Increase Employment From the Supreme Court to Governors http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/11 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/11 Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:20:16 PDT We have relied on a one person one job model for some time in which one person holds a job like Supreme Court Justice or Governor. We could use other models. Someone could be like a utility player filling in for the Justice or Governor or office holder. We could have a new Supreme Court Justice each month or each year so that more people could hold the Supreme Court Justice position and those people could rotate in and out of the positions. Advantages are 1. rest for job holders, 2. more people hold jobs, 3, more time off for job holders, 4, more income for more persons, 5. more variety for office holders. Disadvantages are pension problems in which too many people would be eligible for pensions. For example 1 Justice each month would create 12 new pensioners a year at cost to the US. Rotating, sharing or multiple office holders splitting salaries might decrease election costs; there are some situations in which the two or 20 candidates might agree that they do not really disagree on much and the election is a waste of time and money. Does democracy really erode when we do not vote and many candidates hold office? Does democracy increase when many people hold offices?

]]> James T. Struck jobs, Supreme Court, Multiple, Employment, rotating, changing, justices Multiple Office Holders To Increase Employment From the Supreme Court to Governors http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/10 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/10 Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:19:58 PDT We have relied on a one person one job model for some time in which one person holds a job like Supreme Court Justice or Governor. We could use other models. Someone could be like a utility player filling in for the Justice or Governor or office holder. We could have a new Supreme Court Justice each month or each year so that more people could hold the Supreme Court Justice position and those people could rotate in and out of the positions. Advantages are 1. rest for job holders, 2. more people hold jobs, 3, more time off for job holders, 4, more income for more persons, 5. more variety for office holders. Disadvantages are pension problems in which too many people would be eligible for pensions. For example 1 Justice each month would create 12 new pensioners a year at cost to the US. Rotating, sharing or multiple office holders splitting salaries might decrease election costs; there are some situations in which the two or 20 candidates might agree that they do not really disagree on much and the election is a waste of time and money. Does democracy really erode when we do not vote and many candidates hold office? Does democracy increase when many people hold offices?

]]> James T. Struck jobs, Supreme Court, Multiple, Employment, rotating, changing, justices Discovery of a New Element or New Element Groups and Associated Dangers and Risks, After the Trans Uranium and Uranium Investigations .Why Some Elements or Element Groups May be Left As Art, Drawings or Ideas To Limit Radiation Exposure Risks and Also to Avoid Legal Problems Related to Toxicity http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/9 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/9 Thu, 08 Apr 2010 20:01:57 PDT A new element or element group could be described consisting of parts of neutrons and parts of protons. We can draw exotic and new elements without producing them. When someone produces this new element group of combinations of parts of protons and parts of neutrons, we can understand that there will be associated health risks that can be avoided through discussion of these risks. Because radiation is discriminated against with denial of rights by some organizations, the elements are more safely not produced to avoid associated discrimination such as denial of phone, visitation, fresh air, consent, chemicals used, religious services, dental services, denial of coming home, museums, zoos, mail, records, care giving bills that some guardians (such as Cook County Guardian and some nursing homes) deny currently to people associated with issues such as radiation exposure. New element groups or elements may be safely drawn, conceptualized or imagined as there are almost no health risks associated with imagination, art and drawing. Legal problems can be avoided through drawing and art of new elements.

]]> James T. Struck Physics Law, Radiation, Element Discovery, Science Law, Radiation Exposure, Elements Majority Rule Not a Clearly Stated Component of United States Constitution or Supreme Court Decisions-Supreme Court and Judicial Rulings Could Even Be Seen as Advisory Not Binding Based on the US Constitution http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/8 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/8 Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:53:13 PST Majority rule may play a role in the election of a president, but the Constitution does not apply such rule to the Supreme Court or other courts in a stated or clear way. Supreme Court decisions may be seen as advisory based on the lack of mention of judicial roles in the US Constitution, but contempt concepts indicate that judicial decisions are supposed to be seen as binding. Many judicial decisions can be seen as advisory, although clearly tradition has seen judicial rulings as binding and enforceable rather than advisory. From the perspective of the US Constitution, we could see the minority opinion of judges or Justices as just as valuable or important as the majority opinion of Justices or judges.Liberte fraternite et egalite could mean that each of us, and each judge writing a minority or majority opinion, have rights and valuable opinions not just judges who write majority or solo opinions.

]]> James T. Struck Constitutional Law Geneva Conventions Apply to us Should Be extended to apply to soldiers, contractors and civilians http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/7 http://works.bepress.com/james_struck/7 Mon, 21 Dec 2009 13:35:16 PST Geneva Conventions Apply to us Should Be extended to apply to soldiers, contractors and civilians. Illinois courts do not understand that laws are being violated here with regard to civilians.

]]> James T. Struck International Law