Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Truth-of-Consensus in Studies of Physical Attractiveness
Truth-of-consensus methodology presently holds that sex differences in perceptions of physical attractiveness are negligible and may be routinely ignored during prescaling. No determination has been made in the literature of the effects of sexual orientation on this perceptual process. The data presented herein suggest that while sex and sexual orientation of judge are largely irrelevant to prescaling of female stimuli, these variables are important when judging male stimuli. In particular, male homosexuals and male heterosexuals differ significantly in ranking male facial photographs. Thus, experimenters wishing to treat attractiveness levels as known quantities should control for this difference, especially when using a small number of judges for prescaling.
James M. Donovan, Elizabeth Hill, and William R. Jankowiak. "Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Truth-of-Consensus in Studies of Physical Attractiveness" Journal of Sex Research 26.2 (1989): 264-271.
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/james_donovan/21