Skip to main content
Article
Gaps and opportunities in refractory status epilepticus research in children: A multi-center approach by the Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group (pSERG)
Seizure
  • Ivan Sanchez Fernandez, Harvard Medical School
  • Nicholas S. Abend, University of Pennsylvania
  • Satish Agadi, Baylor College of Medicine
  • Sookee An, Harvard Medical School
  • Ravindra Arya, University of Cincinnati
  • Jessica L. Carpenter, George Washington University
  • Kevin E. Chapman, University of Colorado
  • William D. Gaillard, George Washington University
  • Tracy A. Glauser, University of Cincinnati
  • David B. Golstein, Duke University
  • Joshua L. Goldstein, Northwestern University
  • Howard P. Goodkin, University of Virginia
  • Cecil D. Hahn, University of Toronto
  • Erin L. Heinzen, Duke University
  • Mohamad A. Mikati, Duke University
  • Katrina Peariso, University of Cincinnati
  • John P. Pestian, University of Cincinnati
  • Margie Ream, Duke University
  • James J. Riviello, New York University
  • Robert C. Tasker, Harvard Medical School
  • Korwyn Williams, University of Arizona
  • Tobias Loddenkemper, Harvard University
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Date
2-1-2014
Inclusive Pages
87-97
Keywords
  • Status Epilepticus--therapy
Disciplines
Abstract

PURPOSE:

Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening condition that can be refractory to initial treatment. Randomized controlled studies to guide treatment choices, especially beyond first-line drugs, are not available. This report summarizes the evidence that guides the management of refractory convulsive SE (RCSE) in children, defines gaps in our clinical knowledge and describes the development and works of the 'pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group' (pSERG). METHODS:

A literature review was performed to evaluate current gaps in the pediatric SE and RCSE literature. In person and online meetings helped to develop and expand the pSERG network. RESULTS:

The care of pediatric RCSE is largely based on extrapolations of limited evidence derived from adult literature and supplemented with case reports and case series in children. No comparative effectiveness trials have been performed in the pediatric population. Gaps in knowledge include risk factors for SE, biomarkers of SE and RCSE, second- and third-line treatment options, and long-term outcome. CONCLUSION:

The care of children with RCSE is based on limited evidence. In order to address these knowledge gaps, the multicenter pSERG was established to facilitate prospective collection, analysis, and sharing of de-identified data and biological specimens from children with RCSE. These data will allow identification of treatment strategies associated with better outcomes and delineate evidence-based interventions to improve the care of children with SE.

Comments

Reproduced with permission of Seizure.

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
Peer Reviewed
1
Open Access
1
Citation Information
Ivan Sanchez Fernandez, Nicholas S. Abend, Satish Agadi, Sookee An, et al.. "Gaps and opportunities in refractory status epilepticus research in children: A multi-center approach by the Pediatric Status Epilepticus Research Group (pSERG)" Seizure Vol. Volume 23, Issue 2 (2014)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ivan_fernandez/10/