![](https://d3ilqtpdwi981i.cloudfront.net/PfUUNKDXYVQfhjMzbVoWaYIBczQ=/425x550/smart/https://bepress-attached-resources.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/0d/11/9f/0d119f7f-572b-4b6b-a9b1-c12174fb6d25/thumbnail_5c2920e0-9953-4163-bf00-ab6aca81201f.jpg)
As this article proposes, law school criminal defense clinics provide an excellent environment to design and implement a non-capital mitigation investigation protocol based on the techniques used in death penalty cases. From a pedagogical perspective, such a model promotes student development of foundational lawyering skills and values, especially in the vital area of “narrative thinking characteristic of everyday practice.” From a pragmatic standpoint, creation of a mitigation investigation model benefits clinic clients and boosts the likelihood that similar investigative methods will become a staple of the student's post-graduate practice.
Part I charts the evolution of capital mitigation investigation and highlights recent jurisprudence signaling a movement of concepts associated with capital mitigation to non-capital cases. Part II provides a brief history of clinical legal education and outlines the structure and pedagogical goals of the non-capital criminal defense clinic. Finally, Part III explores how the use of a capital mitigation investigative model in non-capital criminal defense clinics advances clinical pedagogical goals.