Skip to main content
Article
Clinical Blood Flow Quantification with Segmented k-Space Magnetic Resonance Phase Velocity Mapping
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • George P Chatzimavroudis, Cleveland State University
  • Haosen Zhang, Cleveland State University
  • Sandra S. Halliburton, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • James R. Moore, Siemens Medical Solutions USA
  • Orlando Simonetti, Siemens Medical Solutions USA
  • Paulo R. Schvartzman, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Arthur E. Stillman, Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Richard D. White, Clevealnd Clinic Foundation
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2003
Abstract

To evaluate the accuracy of segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping (PVM) in quantifying aortic blood flow from through-plane velocity measurements.

Two segmented PVM schemes were evaluated, one with seven lines per segment (seg-7) and one with nine lines per segment (seg-9), in twenty patients with cardiovascular disease. A non-segmented (non-seg) PVM acquisition was also performed to provide the reference data.

There was agreement between the aortic flow curves acquired with segmented and non-segmented PVM. The calculated systolic and total flow volume per cycle from the seg-7 and the seg-9 scans correlated and agreed with the flow volumes from the non-seg scans (differences < 5%). Sign tests showed that there were no statistically significant differences (P-values < 0.05) between the segmented and the non-segmented PVM measurements. Seg-9, which was the fastest among the three sequences, provided adequate spatial and temporal resolution (> 10 phases per cycle).

Comments

Presented at the 10th Annual Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Honolulu, 2002.

DOI
10.1002/jmri.10231
Version
Postprint
Citation Information
Chatzimavroudis GP, Zhang H, Halliburton SS, Moore JR, Simonetti OP, Schvartzman PR, Stillman AE, White RD. Clinical blood flow quantification with segmented k-space magnetic resonance phase velocity mapping. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2003;17:65-71.