Article
Positive and normative analysis of the output opportunity costs of GHG emissions reductions: A comparison of the six largest EU economies
Energy Policy
(2018)
Abstract
Any policy that aims at reducing GHG emissions by way of modulating the structure of an economy will entail
resource reallocation and therefore an implicit economic cost. In this paper, we present a novel answer to this
question using positive and normative analyses in such a way that they complement one another. From a positive
perspective, we first propose a new look at the analysis of sectors’ distributed GHG forward emissions on the
basis of absolute rather than marginal effects. Using this information, we then move to a normative viewpoint
using an environmental extended input-output linear programming system and compute lower bounds for the
potential gross and net output losses for each production unit when facing emissions reduction targets, such as
those proposed by the European Union in their 20-20-20 Directive. The originality of our approach relies on two
aspects, namely, the introduction of an Armington assumption to link domestic and imported output and that,
differently to previous works, total final demand drives the optimal adjustments to reach emissions cuts while
minimizing output losses. Our empirical exercise compares the results of these normative and positive analyses
for the six largest economies in the European Union.
Disciplines
Publication Date
November, 2018
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.022
Citation Information
Ferran Sancho and Ana-Isabel Guerra. "Positive and normative analysis of the output opportunity costs of GHG emissions reductions: A comparison of the six largest EU economies" Energy Policy Iss. 122 (2018) p. 45 - 62 Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ferran_sancho/71/