<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Erin Davis</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2011  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis</link>
<description>Recent documents in Erin Davis</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 01:34:21 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	







<item>
<title>Outcomes and Assessment in Post-Immersion Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Utah: Applying Immersion Principles to Public Libraries, Teacher Effectiveness, and the Student-Centered Classroom</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/7</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2011 09:38:49 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Erin L. Davis et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Creating Effective Staff Development Committees: A Case Study</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/6</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:29:34 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><em>Purpose</em> – The purpose of this paper is to explore the role  of staff development committees (SDC) in the motivation, morale and  education of library staff by relying on previous research and by using  Utah State University's (USU), Merrill-Cazier Library SDC as a case  study.</p>
<p><em>Design/methodology/approach</em> – Discussion and  analysis emerge from the documented formation of USU's SDC, including  its membership, goals, and evaluative practices, especially as it  relates to current research in this area. Informal staff comments  regarding benefits and limitations of the committee are included.</p>
<p><em>Findings</em> – Staff development has been approached from various perspectives. Most  programs form as the results of formal or informal needs assessments.  Goals for the program, or for the resulting staff development committee,  vary and fluctuate depending on the time-specific needs of the library.  Successful elements of USU's SDC include its emphasis on building  inter-departmental relationships and its ability to elicit feedback from  every level of the library. Challenges include having clearly defined  goals and meeting a variety of individual and institutional needs  through the creation of related events and activities.</p>
<p><em>Practical implications</em> – This paper provides ideas on forming a staff development committee,  including examples for specific events and activities. It details how to  structure membership and explores literature relating to designing and  implementing institutional goals for staff development.</p>
<p><em>Originality/value</em> – Many studies lack a comprehensive literature review that focuses on  the scope and purpose of staff development committees. This paper  combines a literature review with an explanation of how USU's Library  created a staff development committee to fill certain library-wide  goals, including challenges and benefits that emerged as a result.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Erin L. Davis et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Librarian Perceptions and Information Literacy Instruction Models</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/5</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 09:29:31 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p><em>Purpose</em> – This paper aims to explore both instruction librarians' attitudes on  teaching and how they identify themselves as teachers. Particular  attention is to be paid to teaching librarians' views on the  effectiveness of two types of instruction models: for-credit courses and  course-integrated library instruction.</p>
<p><em>Design/methodology/approach</em> – To investigate librarians' attitudes towards these two models, a  survey was constructed targeting librarians who teach information  literacy (IL).</p>
<p><em>Findings</em> – The results indicate that  there is an important relationship between the IL instruction model  employed and feelings towards campus politics, perceived effectiveness  of IL models, and librarians' self-identification as teachers.</p>
<p><em>Research limitations/implications</em> – The survey was sent to list-servs whose readership includes high  percentages of teaching librarians and received 276 responses. This is  by no means an exhaustive study. The research is intended to be  exploratory and to delve more deeply than the past editorials and blog  posts on the issue of comparing for-credit and course-integrated  instruction.</p>
<p><em>Practical implications</em> – This study can  help librarians gain a better understanding of how information literacy  models impact librarian perceptions of themselves and their role on  campus.</p>
<p><em>Originality/value</em> – The authors seek to  transform a discussion that has occurred mostly informally (in blog  posts, on list-servs, and in conversations) into a formal investigation  of librarians' attitudes towards the two models.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Erin L. Davis et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Instruction by the Numbers: Using Data to Improve Teaching and Learning</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/4</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:23:55 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Outcomes assessment has been a mandate across higher education for at least a decade, and instruction librarians are no strangers to the call to show what their students have actually learned.  Most libraries keep general statistics on instruction, including the number of class sessions librarians teach and the number of students in attendance.  These numbers, however, reflect only "outputs" of an instruction program.  Administrators call upon librarians (and other faculty) to measure student learning and the impact of specific programs on student retention.  Educational theory and practice provide models for assessment, yet librarians face significant challenges in this environment.  Librarians often teach only single sessions of courses conceived, created, and controlled by traditional teaching faculty members, with little control over course pedagogy or learning outcomes, and limited opportunities to assess students.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Wendy Holliday et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>A Happy Employee is a Productive Employee</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/3</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 12:59:25 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Erin L. Davis</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Gathering Leadership Momentum Across Great Distances: Creating an Online Community of Practice</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/erin_davis/1</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:54:31 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>At the 2007 Mountain Plains Library Association Leadership (MPLA) Institute, held in New Mexico, USA, eight academic librarians formed an online multi-state, multigenerational community of practice. MPLA is a twelve-state library association within the United States. Using Google Groups™, the members formed an online environment called the MPLA Community of Practice for continuing development of the leadership skills presented at the Institute. These early-career librarians represent diverse educational backgrounds and work in libraries serving varied populations with differing disciplinary emphases.</p>
<p>The group meets monthly with each member preparing and facilitating online discussions, complete with personal assessments, topical readings, and questions. The Google Groups™ site is also used to discuss important library issues including sharing innovative practices, identifying useful resources, and discussing timely workplace issues. The group has been extremely successful not only at maintaining regular communication but also pursuing opportunities for continuing professional development. This paper highlights how librarians can develop and launch a peer-mentoring space using free online tools such as Google Groups™, Skype™, and Doodle™ from anywhere in the world. It also addresses current literature related to communities of practice, leadership topics discussed by the group, and personal stories about its impact on individual group members.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Erin L. Davis et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>

