Skip to main content
Article
A ten-year comparison of women authorship in U.S. dermatology literature, 1999 vs. 2009
Department of Biostatistics Faculty Publications
  • Shali Zhang, Emory University
  • Ha-Young Kim, Emory University
  • Rachel E.S. Hill, Emory University
  • Emir Veledar, Department of Biostatistics, Florida International University
  • Suephy C. Chen, Emory University; Atlanta Veterans Administration Medical Center
Date of this Version
1-1-2016
Document Type
Article
Disciplines
Abstract

Women are entering medicine at increasing rates, particularly in dermatology. In this study, we compared women’s influence and status in academic dermatology with that of men by examining authorship roles in peer-reviewed dermatology literature.Weexamined the literature in2009 and compared that to10 years prior (1999).Atotal of 1399 articles were reviewed, 594 of whichmet study criteria andwere included in statistical analysis. There was amarked increase in senior female authorship over a decade (22% vs. 38%, p b 0.001). Female first authorship increased as well (41% vs. 51%, p b 0.001). In contrast, changes in male senior and first authorship were not statistically significant. Federal funding for female senior authors increased over a decade (19% vs. 37%, p=0.05), and female senior authors in the 2009 cohort were more likely to hold a dual MD/PhD degree (0% vs. 11%, p=0.04) or pure PhD degree (11% vs. 27%, p = 0.04).Women are approaching parity with men in terms of authorship in the dermatology literature, and additional research training and attainment of federal funding have helped women publish as senior authors.

Comments

Originally published in International Journal of Women's Dermatology.

Creative Commons License
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Citation Information
A ten-year comparison of women authorship in U.S. dermatology literature, 1999 vs. 2009 Zhang, Shali et al. International Journal of Women's Dermatology , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , 1 - 4