<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Eleanor Helms-Zoller</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2012  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/ehelmszo</link>
<description>Recent documents in Eleanor Helms-Zoller</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:18:17 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Language and Responsibility: The Possibilities and Problems of Poetic Thinking for Environmental Philosophy</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/ehelmszo/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/ehelmszo/1</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 14:58:22 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>There is a sense in which poetry can re-inscribe humans in their natural surroundings, but language—even poetic language—is also always problematic. In conversation with and in response to recent works by David Abram, I will delineate at least two ways in which poetic language separates and distinguishes humans from nature. I also argue for the importance of what is implicit or invisible (as opposed to tangible and sensuous). Language is a mode of human responsibility for the world, not just a sign or result of being part of it.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Eleanor D. Helms</author>


<category>Articles</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
