PDF

The Myth of the Generalist Judge: An Empirical Analysis of Opinion Specialization in the Federal Courts of Appeals, Stanford L. Rev. (2008)

Link

Independent Judicial Research in the Daubert Age, 56 Duke L.J. 1263 (2007)

The Perils of Evidentiary Manipulation, 93 Va. L. Rev. In Brief 191 (2007)

Link

Same Old, Same Old: Scientific Evidence Past and Present (reviewing T. Golan, Laws of Men and Laws of Nature (2004)), 104 Mich. L. Rev. 1387 (2006)

Link

Should Judges Do Independent Research on Scientific Issues?, 90 Judicature 58 (2006)

Link

Structural Laws and the Puzzle of Regulating Behavior, 100 Nw. U.L. Rev. 655 (2006)

Link

Does Frye or Daubert Matter?: A Study of Scientific Admissibility Standards (with Albert H. Yoon), 91 Va. L. Rev. 471 (2005)

Link

Mitochondrial DNA: Emerging Legal Issues, 13 J.L. & Pol’y 99 (2005)

Link

Re-envisioning Law Through the DNA Lens, 60 N.Y.U. Ann. Surv. Am. L. 649 (2005)

Link

Changing Scientific Evidence, 88 Minn. L. Rev. 315 (2003)

Link

Constitutional Risks to Equal Protection in the Criminal Justice System, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 2098 (2001)

Intentions and Obliging Behavior Online: An Application of Semiotic and Legal Modeling in E-Commerce (with J. Backhouse), 12 J. End User Computing 33 (2000)

Link

The Supreme Court, 1999 Term – Leading Cases, 114 Harv. L. Rev. 339 (2000)

Link

Recent Case, 113 Harv. L. Rev. 621 (1999)

Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony (with David L. Faigman, Michael J. Saks, and Joseph Sanders) (2006)

Link

The Myth of the Generalist Judge: An Empirical Analysis of Opinion Specialization in the Federal Courts of Appeals, ExpressO (2007)