Skip to main content
Article
The Predictive Ability of Geographic Segment Disclosures by U.S. Companies: SFAS No. 131 vs. SFAS No. 14
Journal of International Accounting Research
  • Bruce K. Behn, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga
  • Nancy B. Nichols, James Madison University
  • Donna L. Street, University of Dayton
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2002
Abstract

This research considers whether recent modifications to segment reporting adequately address analysts' concerns regarding the usefulness of geographic data. Forecast errors for models utilizing SFAS No. 131 geographic sales data are compared to forecast errors for models utilizing SFAS No. 14 geographic sales data. The results indicate a significant improvement in the predictive accuracy of geographic sales disclosures provided under SFAS No. 131. Additional analysis suggests this enhanced predictability may be associated with the revised requirements that companies report sales for the country of domicile and for each individually material country. Overall, our findings appear to support the FASB's argument that segment information by country is more informative and useful. Based on our findings, recommendations are presented regarding possible amendments to SFAS No. 131 that may further enhance the predictive ability of geographic segment data.

Inclusive pages
31-44
ISBN/ISSN
1542-6297
Comments

Copyright © 2002, American Accounting Association

Publisher
American Accounting Association
Peer Reviewed
Yes
Citation Information
Bruce K. Behn, Nancy B. Nichols and Donna L. Street. "The Predictive Ability of Geographic Segment Disclosures by U.S. Companies: SFAS No. 131 vs. SFAS No. 14" Journal of International Accounting Research Vol. 1 Iss. 1 (2002)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/donna_street/19/