<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Debra J Stokes</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes</link>
<description>Recent documents in Debra J Stokes</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 14:22:29 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>The benthic ecology of expanding mangrove habitat, Tauranga Harbour, New Zealand</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/9</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/9</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:32:47 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Ecological prioritisation of estuaries in the Waikato Region</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/8</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/8</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:14 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Expansion dynamics of mono-specific, temperate mangroves and sedimentation in two embayments of a barrier-enclosed lagoon, Tauranga Harbour, New Zealand</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/6</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:13 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>In recent years, mangrove expansion has become a coastal management issue in the North Island of New Zealand. Little is known about the spatial evolution and forest structure of temperate mangrove forests in New Zealand or about the associated rates of sedimentation. The extent of mangrove colonization in both a large (Waikareao Estuary) and small (Welcome Bay) embayment within Tauranga Harbour were documented. Forest structure and growth rates were described using tree height, stem density, pneumatophore density, and seedling establishment. Surface elevation changes within mangrove habitat were determined from erosion pin measurements and, on bare intertidal flats, using buried baseplates. Sediment texture and availability was also assessed using sediment traps. Results show that in 1943, mangrove vegetation covered <1% of either embayment, with ongoing expansion resulting in mangrove habitat occupying 9% of Welcome Bay and 6% of Waikareao Estuary in 2003. Mean plant heights were all <1.5 m, with vertical plant growth of 3 cm y−1 to 7.5 cm y−1. Pneumatophore densities ranged from 200 per m2 to 540 per m2, and seedling densities of <1 per m2 to 14 per m2, with seasonal variation, were documented. Surface elevation changes within mangrove habitat ranged from 0 to +21 mm y−1, compared with −16 to +15 mm y−1 on adjacent bare flats. Surface sediment within the mangrove habitat was mostly muddy, whereas bare flats were dominated by fine sand. Sediment-trap results provided accumulation rates of up to 32,000 g m−2 mo−1 on bare flats, and close to 29,000 g m−2 mo−1 within the fringing mangrove vegetation. In this study, mangrove vegetation was found to successfully trap and hold muddy sediments, resulting in increased surface elevation. Rising surface elevation from fine sand deposition is also occurring on bare tidal flats in front of mangrove vegetation at some sites.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Mangroves in New Zealand</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/7</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:13 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Mangroves in New Zealand? New Zealand must be far too cold for such things, surely? And they want to get rid of them? How curious. Surely there’s a PhD thesis in that?</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Whangamata mangrove removal: benthic impacts 2005-2007</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/5</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:12 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Mangrove expansion and their human removal in Tauranga Harbour, New Zealand</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/4</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:12 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Mangrove (Avicennia marina var. australasica) populations have expanded rapidly in recent years in northern parts of New Zealand. In some estuaries and harbours, an increase in coverage of 120% over the last 50 years has been recorded. Conflicting public perceptions of mangroves cause difficulty in designing agreeable management strategies. Perceived negative factors include: a hindrance to water access; the loss of habitat for culturally important benthic organisms; reduced foraging habitat for wading birds; and the muddy substrate is seen as aesthetically unpleasant. Others see the mangrove expansion as a natural process and believe it should be unimpeded.</p>
<p>Tauranga Harbour, in the Bay of Plenty, is a large and populated estuary in the North Island. Geomorphologically it is a barrier-enclosed lagoon, with approximately 70% exposed intertidal flats at low tide. Rapid mangrove expansion means that this estuary provides an excellent case study to assess the geomorphological and ecological changes that occur in response to the expansion and any consequent mangrove removal. To this end a two-year intensive monitoring program has been developed to determine temporal and spatial changes to sediment particle size and substrate depth. Comparisons will be drawn between control sites and those where mangroves have been removed, and determine how these differences might reflect variation in the physical environment (wave, tidal currents, nutrient levels). These local results will provide the basis for a mangrove management policy for the estuary as a whole.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes et al.</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Assessment of physical changes after mangrove removal: Whangamata Harbour 2008</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/3</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:11 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Sediment cores were taken and epifaunal counts carried out in the following areas:</p>
<p>1. cleared and mown mangrove habitat (site WMA) 2. cleared but not mown mangrove habitat (site WMB) 3. recently cleared mangrove habitat (site WMC)  4. intact mangrove habitat (site WMD) 5. bare (undisturbed) intertidal flat habitat (site WME)</p>
<p>Sample analyses confirmed that surface sediments in the 2005 cleared mown site (WMA) are similar in 2008 to those in the existing mangrove habitat, with over 50% mud present at both sites.  Silty (mud-dominated) sediments occur to depths greater than 5 cm in the cleared site WMA, suggesting that the mud is either continuing to accumulate and/or is not being redistributed after mangrove removal.</p>
<p>Core stratigraphy revealed silty sands to depths below 12 cm at all cleared sites, suggesting that it would be some time, if at all, before these sites evolve to a purely sandy environment under the present-day hydrodynamic regime.  Surface sediments in cleared sites WMB and WMC were dominated by fine and medium sands (with some mud), indicating that some of the mud particles have been winnowed out over time, but that any further significant coarsening of sediments may either not occur, or will occur very slowly.  Further core sampling will provide valuable information on erosion of fine sediments over time at these sites.</p>
<p>The rate of biomass decomposition influences how surface sediment characteristics change over time, as the mass of fine roots remaining in the sediment still functions to trap fine sediment particles until such time that the roots decompose and break down completely.  Sizes and ages of (former) trees at sites WMA, WMB and WMC are unknown because they were cleared before any such measurements could be taken.  Interestingly however, the below-ground biomass average of 3.47 kg m2 in the highly impacted cleared site (WMA) is higher than that which has been measured in healthy (intact) mangrove habitat in an estuary in Tauranga Harbour (Stokes and Healy submitted).  The other cleared sites also still have relatively high levels of root biomass with over 1 kg (dry weight) of root material per square metre.</p>
<p>There are two possible explanations for the significantly greater mass of root material found at the highly impacted cleared site (WMA) compared with all other sampling sites; firstly that the highly anoxic and hydrodynamically quiet environment is inhibiting decomposition and breakdown processes, and secondly that these processes have been further inhibited by sediment compaction resulting from vehicle use in the area.  Compaction reduces the erosion potential of surface sediments and slows down decomposition processes by creating a highly anoxic zone (as demonstrated by the black colour of the sediments).</p>
<p>Surface macrofauna were generally only present in low numbers at all sites.  Analyses of temporal trends in the data indicate that benthic invertebrate abundance and diversity are increasing with time and that the disparity in population structure between the mangrove site and the cleared site may decrease as time goes on.  However, given that manual (and consented) removal of mangrove seedlings is now a regular occurrence, and that the below-ground environment has been significantly altered in places, the cleared sites are unlikely to revert back to mangrove habitat.  The changes observed in the sediment composition and the structure of benthic communities in the cleared areas, along with a significant decline in benthic faunal abundance and species richness indicate that the cleared sites have not recovered within the observation period (2005 – 2008).</p>
<p>The results from this study provide some insight into the physical characteristics of the mangrove habitat at Moanaanuanu Estuary, and the intertidal areas that were cleared of mangroves.  The high mud content and below ground biomass documented at one of the cleared sites highlights the importance of considering the intertidal position and hydrodynamics of a site before planning the removal of any coastal vegetation.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes</author>


</item>






<item>
<title>Surface elevation changes and sediment characteristics of intertidal surfaces undergoing mangrove expansion and mangrove removal, Waikaraka Estuary, Tauranga Harbour, New Zealand</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/debra_stokes/1</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:38:10 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>Since the 1940s mangroves have expanded their areal coverage in many estuaries in the northern half of the North Island of New Zealand. The extent of mangrove colonization in Waikaraka Estuary, Tauranga Harbour, has been documented using photogrammetric analysis, and the impacts of subsequent mangrove removal are analysed. Surface elevation changes in response to mangrove removal are measured using RSETs (Rod Surface Elevation Table) and erosion pins, and sediment accumulation rates were calculated from sediment trap results. Temporal changes to surface sediment texture are analysed. Mangrove physiognomy is described from analysis of mean plant height, plant density and pneumatophore density. Plant heights reflect the shrubby growth form of mangroves growing toward their southern climatic limit, with mean plant heights under 1.5 m. Mangrove coverage has increased from approximately 16,000 m2 in 1943 to 115,000 m2 in 2003. Since May 2005, 9,600 m2 of mangrove vegetation has been removed from the estuary.For the monitoring period of March 2006 to March 2007, rates of surface elevation change in cleared areas ranged from - 9 mm to - 38 mm yr (mean -14 mm yr). Conversely, surface elevation under mangrove forest varied between sites, ranging from -5 mm to 14 mm yr (mean 3 mm yr). Results from RSETs and erosion pins and a coarsening of surface sediment texture at the cleared sites, is consistent with sediment release after mangrove removal.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Debra J. Stokes et al.</author>


</item>





</channel>
</rss>
