Articles «Previous Next»

The Role of Person Versus Situation in Life Satisfaction: A Critical Examination

Daniel Heller
David Watson, University of Iowa

Abstract

Two main theoretical approaches have been put forward to explain individual differences in life satisfaction: top-down (i.e., personological) and bottom-up (i.e., situational). The authors examine the relative merit of these 2 approaches and the psychological processes underlying top-down models. Consistent with a top-down approach, meta-analytic findings indicate that Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness are related to both various domain satisfactions and life satisfaction; however, consistent with a bottom-up approach, domain satisfactions are strongly linked to life satisfaction but only weakly linked to each other. Path analyses based on meta-analytic estimates did not support a simple "direct-effects" top-down model but supported both (a) a temperament-based top-down model and (b) an integrative model that incorporates the direct influence of domain satisfactions on life satisfaction. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Suggested Citation

Daniel Heller and David Watson. "The Role of Person Versus Situation in Life Satisfaction: A Critical Examination" Psychological Bulletin. 130.4 (2004): 574-600.