Skip to main content
Presentation
Toward a more accurate view of when and how people seek help with computer applications
Proceedings of SIGDOC 2007 (2007)
  • David G. Novick, The University of Texas at El Paso
  • Edith Elizalde, The University of Texas at El Paso
  • Nathaniel Bean, The University of Texas at El Paso
Abstract
Based on 40 interviews and 11 on-site workplace observations of people using computer applications at work, we confirm that use of printed and on-line help is very low and find that providing greater detail of categories solution methods can present a more realistic picture of users’ behaviors. Observed study participants encountered a usability problem on average about once every 75 minutes and typically spent about a minute looking for a solution. Participants consumed much more time when they were unaware of a direct way of doing something and instead used less effective methods. Comparison of results from different data-collection methods suggests that interviews, and probably surveys, provide less reliable views of users’ problem-solving behaviors than do participatory evaluation and direct observation.
Keywords
  • Documentation,
  • usability,
  • evaluation
Disciplines
Publication Date
October, 2007
Citation Information
David G. Novick, Edith Elizalde and Nathaniel Bean. "Toward a more accurate view of when and how people seek help with computer applications" Proceedings of SIGDOC 2007 (2007)
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/david_novick/16/