This article posits that regulating in an area of speech that raises questions about its social value and potential harm will be extremely difficult under the Roberts Court. Government restrictions targeting the content of low value, but protected, expression will be reviewed under the exacting standards of core First Amendment speech. Even though the broadcast indecency policy is shrouded in administrative agency deference standards, it is unlikely that the Court will give the FCC free-wheeling reign to enforce its new policy, which is much more speech-restrictive than the FCC’s enforcement policy of the past forty years. While the Court may not reach the ultimate question of whether Pacifica is or should be overturned, the Fox case may bring the Court one step closer to erasing the First Amendment distinctions between broadcast media and other forms of media.