Skip to main content
Article
Case for Fencing Remains Intact
Ecology Letters (2013)
  • Dan R. MacNulty
Abstract
Creel et al . argue against the conservation effectiveness of fencing based on a population measure that ignores the importance of top predators to ecosystem processes. Their statistical analyses consider, first, only a subset of fenced reserves and, second, an incomplete examination of ‘costs per lion.’ Our original conclusions remain unaltered.
Disciplines
Publication Date
2013
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12171
Citation Information
Dan R. MacNulty. "Case for Fencing Remains Intact" Ecology Letters Vol. 16 Iss. 1414 (2013) p. e4
Available at: http://works.bepress.com/dan_macnulty/76/