Skip to main content
Contribution to Book
California’s Flawed Surface Water Rights
Economics
  • Michael Hanemann
  • Caitlin Dyckman
  • Damian Park, Santa Clara University
Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
7-24-2015
Publisher
University of California Press
Disciplines
Abstract

California sprang into existence following the discovery of gold in 1848. Aside from domestic use, the first major use of water in California was in mining. The first mining consisted of placer mining of alluvial deposits in stream beds throughout the Sierra foothills. As those deposits were depleted, hydraulic mining arose, in which high-pressure jets of water were used to remove overlying earth from upland gold- bearing deposits. That type of mining, first employed in 1853, required substantial water diversions.

When California entered the Union in 1850, the English common law was adopted as the “rule of decision” in courts, including the doctrine of riparian rights for surface water1 (it was also the governing doctrine in the rest of the Union). Riparian rights entitle the owner of land bordering a surface water body (“riparian” land) to use the water on his or her riparian land. This is a right to use water, not a right of ownership, and it inheres only in riparian lands. Riparian rights remain with the riparian land regardless of changes in ownership. Water under a riparian right cannot be used on nonriparian land.2 The right is shared equally among all riparians: they own access to the stream as “tenants in common.” They can divert water as long as this does not impair the rights of other riparians. No specific quantity attaches to a riparian right. If a riparian originally applied X, this does not preclude him from applying 5X later. Nonuse does not terminate the right. There is no recording of the volume diverted. No institution administers the ripar- ian right. Disputes are resolved through litigation among riparians.

The riparian doctrine was logical where it originated, in a humid region with plentiful streamflow. Streamflow is treated as a common pool to be shared among all riparian landowners. But in an arid region like California, where rivers can run dry by the late summer and annual streamflow can vary by an order of magnitude, there needs to be a specific mechanism for allocating limited streamflow. The riparian right lacks this.

Chapter of
Sustainable Water : Challenges and Solutions from California
Editor
Allison Lassiter
Comments

Copyright © 2015 University of California Press. Reprinted with permission. All rights reserved.

Citation Information
Hanemann, M., Dyckman, C., & Park, D. (2015). California’s Flawed Surface Water Rights. In A. Lassiter (Ed.), Sustainable Water : Challenges and Solutions from California (pp. 52–82). University of California Press.