<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Peter Cramton</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2010  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton</link>
<description>Recent documents in Peter Cramton</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:58:41 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>


	
		
	







<item>
<title>Price Is a Better Climate Commitment</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/163</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/163</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:54:15 PST</pubDate>
<description>At the international level, a global carbon price is a better form of commitment to reduce carbon emissions than a system of national caps. Peter Cramton and Steven Stoft outline a price-based approach that is simple, effective, and remarkably affordable.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Environmental Markets</category>

<category>Q54</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Prediction Markets to Forecast Electricity Demand</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/162</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/162</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:54:29 PST</pubDate>
<description>Forecasting electricity demand for future years is an essential step in resource planning. A common approach is for the system operator to predict future demand from the estimates of individual distribution companies. However, the predictions thus obtained may be of poor quality, since the reporting incentives are unclear. We propose a prediction market as a form of forecasting future demand for electricity. We describe how to implement a simple prediction market for continuous variables, using only contracts based on binary variables. We also discuss specific issues concerning the implementation of such a market.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Market Design</category>

<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Fear of Losing in Dynamic Auctions: An Experimental Study</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/161</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/161</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:50:09 PST</pubDate>
<description>We analyze the implications of different pricing rules in discrete clock auctions. The two most common pricing rules are highest-rejected bid (HRB) and lowest-accepted bid (LAB). Under HRB, the winners pay the lowest price that clears the market; under LAB, the winners pay the highest price that clears the market. This pricing difference creates stronger incentives for bid shading under LAB. When bidders seek to maximize profits, the HRB auction maximizes revenues and is fully efficient. The bid shading under LAB means that a bidder may regret losing. Bidders that anticipate this regret may limit bid shading, causing the LAB auction to achieve higher revenues than the HRB auction. Our experiments confirm that this is the case. The LAB auction achieves higher revenues. This also is the case in a version of the clock auction with provisional winners that is commonly used in spectrum auctions. This revenue result may explain the frequent use of LAB pricing despite the efficiency and simplicity advantages of HRB pricing.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Telecommunications</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

<category>Experimental Economics</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Virtual Power Plant Auctions</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/160</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/160</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:39:57 PST</pubDate>
<description>Since their advent in 2001, virtual power plant (VPP) auctions have been widely implemented. In this paper, we describe the various design choices that virtually all VPP auctions have had in common and also discuss a few aspects of the auction design that have varied significantly among the VPP auctions to date. We then consider whether VPP auctions have been an effective tool for promoting the objectives of regulators. We find that VPP auctions are effective devices for facilitating new entry into electricity markets and for developing wholesale markets, while they are not particularly well suited to making large reductions in market power in the spot market.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Using Forward Markets to Improve Electricity Market Design</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/159</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/159</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:37:19 PST</pubDate>
<description>Forward markets, both medium term and long term, complement the spot market for wholesale electricity. The forward markets reduce risk, mitigate market power, and coordinate new investment. In the medium term, a forward energy market lets suppliers and demanders lock in energy prices and quantities for one to three years. In the long term, a forward reliability market assures adequate resources are available when they are needed most. The forward markets reduce risk for both sides of the market, since they reduce the quantity of energy that trades at the more volatile spot price. Spot market power is mitigated by putting suppliers and demanders in a more balanced position at the time of the spot market. The markets also reduce transaction costs and improve liquidity and transparency. Recent innovations to the Colombia market illustrate the basic elements of the forward markets and their beneficial role.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Collusion</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Global Carbon Pricing: Essential, Inexpensive, and Feasible</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/158</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/158</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:30:50 PST</pubDate>
<description>The failure of the international emission-capping agenda need not and should not block the path to Kyoto's goal of global carbon pricing. Unpriced emissions will remain the root cause of the climate change problem until carbon is priced. This paper follows the suggestions of Joseph Stiglitz, William Nordhaus and James Hansen for a global carbon tax, while expanding the flexibility of the system to allow cap-and-trade to be fully integrated. A global carbon price of $30 per ton together with a Green Fund for equity with developing countries is remarkably inexpensive. The cost per person per day in the United States would be just 23 cents. For a country, like China, with average per-person emissions the cost is 4 cents; for India the cost would be negative--the Green Fund would doubly cover India's abatement costs. The strength and distributional effects of the entire policy are controlled by just two values, the target carbon price and the Clean Development Incentive rate. These replace all national caps and all individual Green-Fund obligations and entitlements.  Such a policy would reduce the world oil price and effectively transfer revenue from oil exporters to oil importers. For China and the United States, this savings would likely cover the full cost of the proposed initial climate agreement.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

<category>Environmental Markets</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Foreword to Ross Baldick&apos;s &apos;Single Clearing Price in Electricity Markets&apos;</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/157</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/157</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:31:29 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Argues that consumers and suppliers are better off with the clearing-price auction in electricity markets.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>A Two-Sided Auction for Legacy Loans</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/156</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/156</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:58:24 PDT</pubDate>
<description>On Monday, 23 March 2009, Treasury Secretary Geithner presented the Public-Private Investment Program as a key instrument to resolve the financial crisis (www.financialstability.gov). The Treasury's description still leaves many issues unanswered. We flesh out the auction design for legacy loans. A two-sided auction is required. Both banks and private investors must compete in a transparent and competitive process.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Finance</category>

<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>How Best to Auction Natural Resources</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/155</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/155</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:55:48 PDT</pubDate>
<description>I study the design of auctions of natural resources, such as oil or mineral rights. A good auction design promotes both an efficient assignment of rights and competitive revenues for the seller. The structure of bidder preferences and the degree of competition are key factors in determining the best design. With weak competition and additive values, a simultaneous first-price sealed-bid auction may suffice. With more complex value structures, a dynamic auction with package bids, such as the clock-proxy auction, likely is needed to promote the efficiency and revenue objectives. Bidding on production shares, rather than bonuses, typically increases government take by reducing oil company risk.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

<category>Natural Resources</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Pricing Rule in a Clock Auction</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/154</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/154</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:50:32 PDT</pubDate>
<description>We analyze a discrete clock auction with lowest-accepted bid (LAB) pricing and provisional winners, as adopted by India for its 3G spectrum auction. In a perfect Bayesian equilibrium, the provisional winner shades her bid while provisional losers do not. Such differential shading leads to inefficiency. The size of the inefficiency declines with smaller bid increments. An auction with highest-rejected bid (HRB) pricing and exit bids is strategically simple, has no bid shading, and is fully efficient. In addition, it has higher revenues than the LAB auction, assuming profit maximizing bidders. The bid shading in the LAB auction exposes bidders to the possibility of losing the auction at a price below the bidder's value. Thus, fear of losing may cause bidders in the LAB auction to bid more aggressively than predicted assuming profit-maximizing bidders. We extend the model by adding an anticipated loser's regret to the payoff function. Revenue from the LAB auction yields higher expected revenue than the HRB auction when bidders' fear of losing at profitable prices is sufficiently strong. This would provide one explanation why India, with an expressed objective of revenue maximization, adopted the LAB auction for its upcoming 3G spectrum auction, rather than the seemingly superior HRB auction.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Telecommunications</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Auctioning the Digital Dividend</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/153</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/153</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:46:21 PDT</pubDate>
<description>I begin by describing some of the problems of the simultaneous ascending auction. Then I present the package clock auction, which retains the benefits, while addressing the weaknesses, of the simultaneous ascending auction. I emphasize two essential elements of the package clock auction: the pricing rule and the activity rule. Along the way, I summarize both experimental and field results with the package clock auction.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Telecommunications</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Reply Statement on the Effect of NextWave&apos;s Participation in the C-block Auction on Antigone and Devco</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/152</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/152</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:08:04 PST</pubDate>
<description>For Antigone and Devco.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Telecommunications</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Statement on the Effect of NextWave&apos;s Participation in the C-block Auction on Antigone and Devco</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/151</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/151</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:07:11 PST</pubDate>
<description>For Antigone and Devco.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Telecommunications</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Expert Report of Peter C. Cramton</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/150</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/150</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:05:59 PST</pubDate>
<description>Determine the value of spectrum licenses won by Best Digital in the C-block Broadband PCS auction. For Best Digital.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Auctions</category>

<category>Telecommunications</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>A Review of ISO New England&apos;s Proposed Market Rules</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/149</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/149</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:05:19 PST</pubDate>
<description>For ISO New England.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Affidavit of Peter Cramton</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/148</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/148</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:04:01 PST</pubDate>
<description>Reply to comments on review of rules. For ISO New England.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Affidavit of Peter Cramton</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/147</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/147</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:03:00 PST</pubDate>
<description>Summary of review of reserves and operable capability markets. For ISO New England.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Affidavit of Peter Cramton</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/146</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/146</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:02:19 PST</pubDate>
<description>Comments on one-part vs. three-part bidding in energy market. For ISO New England.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Affidavit of Peter Cramton</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/145</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/145</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:01:36 PST</pubDate>
<description>Comments on installed capability market. For ISO New England.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Affidavit of Peter Cramton</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/cramton/144</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/cramton/144</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 19:00:53 PST</pubDate>
<description>Comments on energy price cap as a response to design flaws. For ISO New England.</description>

<author>Peter Cramton</author>


<category>Electricity and Gas</category>

<category>Market Design</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
