<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Christian A. Meissner, Ph.D.</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2009  All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner</link>
<description>Recent documents in Christian A. Meissner, Ph.D.</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 20:31:06 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>





<item>
<title>Interrogation and torture</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/52</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/52</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 09:55:20 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Christian A. Meissner</author>


<category>Interrogations &amp; Confessions</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Modeling the role of social-cognitive processes in the recognition of own- and other-race faces</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/51</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/51</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:37:01 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Known as the cross-race effect (CRE), psychological research has consistently shown that people are less accurate at identifying faces of another, less familiar race. While the CRE has most often been demonstrated in recognition memory, its effects have also been found in temporally preceding social-cognitive stages - including racial categorization, perceptual discrimination, and higher-level cognitive processing. Using path models of own- and other-race face processing, the current study sought to estimate how temporally preceding processes might mediate the CRE established in recognition memory. Results demonstrated that racial categorization and higher-level cognitive processes primarily mediate the CRE in recognition memory, and that the degree of interracial contact moderated the incidence of repetition errors on other-race faces.</description>

<author>Kyle J. Susa</author>


<category>Cross-Race Effect</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>The need for expert psychological testimony on eyewitness identification</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/50</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/50</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:41:28 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Roy S. Malpass</author>


<category>Eyewitness Identification</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Perceptual identification and the cross-race effect</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/49</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/49</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:38:19 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The current research examined whether the cross-race effect (CRE) was evident in perceptual identification tasks and the extent to which certain boundary conditions moderated the effect. Across two experiments, a significant CRE was observed in measures of accuracy and response latency.  As predicted, Experiment 1 showed that the CRE was exacerbated when encoding time was brief and test set size was increased. Experiment 2 replicated the effect of set size, but also showed that the CRE was more pronounced when the retention interval was lengthened. The theoretical and practical implications of the results are discussed.</description>

<author>Jessica L. Marcon</author>


<category>Cross-Race Effect</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Criminal versus HUMINT interrogations: The importance of psychological science to improving interrogative practice.</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/48</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/48</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:22:42 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The discovery of many cases of wrongful conviction in the criminal justice system involving admissions from innocent suspects has led psychologists to examine the factors contributing to false confessions. However, little systematic research has assessed the processes underlying Human Intelligence (HUMINT) interrogations relating to military and intelligence operations. The current article examines the similarities and differences between interrogations in criminal and HUMINT settings, and discusses the extent to which the current empirical literature can be applied to criminal and/or HUMINT interrogations. Finally, areas of future research are considered in light of the need for improving HUMINT interrogation.</description>

<author>Christian A. Meissner</author>


<category>Interrogations &amp; Confessions</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Can intuition improve deception detection performance?</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/47</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/47</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 08:19:03 PDT</pubDate>
<description>Two studies examined the role of processing style (intuitive vs. deliberative processing) in a deception detection task. In the first experiment, a thin slicing manipulation was used to demonstrate that intuitive processing can lead to more accurate judgments of deception when compared with traditional deliberative forms of processing. In the second experiment, participants who engaged in a secondary (concurrent) task performed more accurately in a deception detection task than participants who were asked to provide a verbal rationale for each decision and those in a control condition. Overall, the results converge to suggest that intuitive processing can significantly improve deception detection performance.</description>

<author>Justin S. Albrechtsen</author>


<category>Deception Detection</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>The importance of a laboratory science for improving the diagnostic value of confession evidence</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/46</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/46</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 18:58:31 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>Christian A. Meissner</author>


<category>Interrogations &amp; Confessions</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- vs. other-race faces</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/45</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/45</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 20:49:58 PDT</pubDate>
<description>The current research examined the contributions of recollection vs. familiarity in memory for own- and other-race faces. Experiment 1 used a repetition lag paradigm (Jennings &amp; Jacoby, 1997) to demonstrate the typical cross-race effect with respect to discrimination accuracy and response bias. Participants were also more likely to commit the 'repetition error' by falsely recognizing repeated other-race faces. Experiment 2 used process-dissociation equations to estimate differences in recollection and familiarity. As predicted, results showed a greater reliance on recollection-based processing for own-race faces. The theoretical and practical implications of these finding are discussed.</description>

<author>Jessica L. Marcon</author>


<category>Cross-Race Effect</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Interrogations and confessions: A conference long overdue</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/44</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/44</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:00:00 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>G Daniel Lassiter</author>


<category>Interrogations &amp; Confessions</category>

</item>


<item>
<title>Interrogations and confessions: Current research, practice, and policy recommendations</title>
<link>http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/43</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://works.bepress.com/christian_meissner/43</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 09:55:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description></description>

<author>G Daniel Lassiter</author>


<category>Interrogations &amp; Confessions</category>

</item>



</channel>
</rss>
